Talbi S, Hamilton A E, Vo K C, Tulac S, Overgaard M T, Dosiou C, Le Shay N, Nezhat C N, Kempson R, Lessey B A, Nayak N R, Giudice L C
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Parnassus, M1495, Box 0132, San Francisco, California 94143-0132, USA.
Endocrinology. 2006 Mar;147(3):1097-121. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-1076. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
Histological evaluation of endometrium has been the gold standard for clinical diagnosis and management of women with endometrial disorders. However, several recent studies have questioned the accuracy and utility of such evaluation, mainly because of significant intra- and interobserver variations in histological interpretation. To examine the possibility that biochemical or molecular signatures of endometrium may prove to be more useful, we have investigated whole-genome molecular phenotyping (54,600 genes and expressed sequence tags) of this tissue sampled across the cycle in 28 normo-ovulatory women, using high-density oligonucleotide microarrays. Unsupervised principal component analysis of all samples revealed that samples self-cluster into four groups consistent with histological phenotypes of proliferative (PE), early-secretory (ESE), mid-secretory (MSE), and late-secretory (LSE) endometrium. Independent hierarchical clustering analysis revealed equivalent results, with two major dendrogram branches corresponding to PE/ESE and MSE/LSE and sub-branching into the four respective phases with heterogeneity among samples within each sub-branch. K-means clustering of genes revealed four major patterns of gene expression (high in PE, high in ESE, high in MSE, and high in LSE), and gene ontology analysis of these clusters demonstrated cycle-phase-specific biological processes and molecular functions. Six samples with ambiguous histology were identically assignable to a cycle phase by both principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. Additionally, pairwise comparisons of relative gene expression across the cycle revealed genes/families that clearly distinguish the transitions of PE-->ESE, ESE-->MSE, and MSE-->LSE, including receptomes and signaling pathways. Select genes were validated by quantitative RT-PCR. Overall, the results demonstrate that endometrial samples obtained by two different sampling techniques (biopsy and curetting hysterectomy specimens) from subjects who are as normal as possible in a human study and including those with unknown histology, can be classified by their molecular signatures and correspond to known phases of the menstrual cycle with identical results using two independent analytical methods. Also, the results enable global identification of biological processes and molecular mechanisms that occur dynamically in the endometrium in the changing steroid hormone milieu across the menstrual cycle in normo-ovulatory women. The results underscore the potential of gene expression profiling for developing molecular diagnostics of endometrial normalcy and abnormalities and identifying molecular targets for therapeutic purposes in endometrial disorders.
子宫内膜的组织学评估一直是诊断和处理子宫内膜疾病女性患者的金标准。然而,最近的几项研究对这种评估的准确性和实用性提出了质疑,主要原因是在组织学解读中存在显著的观察者内和观察者间差异。为了检验子宫内膜的生化或分子特征可能更有用的可能性,我们使用高密度寡核苷酸微阵列,对28名排卵正常的女性在整个月经周期采集的该组织进行了全基因组分子表型分析(54,600个基因和表达序列标签)。对所有样本进行无监督主成分分析发现,样本自行聚类为四组,与增殖期(PE)、早分泌期(ESE)、中分泌期(MSE)和晚分泌期(LSE)子宫内膜的组织学表型一致。独立的层次聚类分析得出了相同的结果,两个主要的树状图分支对应于PE/ESE和MSE/LSE,并进一步细分为四个相应阶段,每个子分支内的样本存在异质性。基因的K均值聚类揭示了四种主要的基因表达模式(PE期高表达、ESE期高表达、MSE期高表达和LSE期高表达),对这些聚类进行的基因本体分析证明了具有周期阶段特异性的生物学过程和分子功能。通过主成分分析和层次聚类,六个组织学不明确的样本都能被明确归为一个周期阶段。此外,对整个周期相对基因表达的成对比较揭示了能够清晰区分PE→ESE、ESE→MSE和MSE→LSE转变的基因/基因家族,包括受体组和信号通路。通过定量RT-PCR对选定基因进行了验证。总体而言,结果表明,在一项尽可能正常的人体研究中,通过两种不同采样技术(活检和刮宫子宫切除标本)获得的子宫内膜样本,包括那些组织学未知的样本,能够根据其分子特征进行分类,并且使用两种独立的分析方法,结果与月经周期的已知阶段相符。此外,这些结果能够全面识别在正常排卵女性月经周期中,处于不断变化的甾体激素环境下,子宫内膜中动态发生的生物学过程和分子机制。这些结果强调了基因表达谱在开发子宫内膜正常和异常的分子诊断方法以及识别子宫内膜疾病治疗靶点方面的潜力。