Ahl Caroline, Nyström Maria, Jansson Lilian
School of Health Sciences, University Collage of Borås, SE-501, 90 Borås, Sweden.
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.002.
The issue of the inappropriate use of ambulance transport and care has mainly been studied from the professionals' and caregivers' perspective, with few studies focusing on the patient and his/her experiences. To further understand whether patients use ambulance care in an inappropriate manner and, if so, why, it is important to obtain an overall picture of the patients' existential situation at the time they call an ambulance. The aim of this study was to analyse and describe patients' experiences related to the decision to call an ambulance and the wait for it to arrive. The design was explorative, and twenty informants aged between 34 and 82 years were interviewed. Qualitative content analyses were performed. The findings showed that calling for an ambulance is a major decision that is preceded by hesitation and attempts to handle the situation by oneself. Our conclusion is that the definition of inappropriate use of valuable health care resources should not be based solely on the professionals' point of view but also take account of the patients' reactions when they experience a threat to their life and health.
救护车运输和护理使用不当的问题主要是从专业人员和护理人员的角度进行研究的,很少有研究关注患者及其经历。为了进一步了解患者是否以不当方式使用救护车护理,如果是,原因是什么,重要的是全面了解患者呼叫救护车时的生存状况。本研究的目的是分析和描述患者与呼叫救护车及等待救护车到达的决定相关的经历。研究设计为探索性,对20名年龄在34岁至82岁之间的受访者进行了访谈,并进行了定性内容分析。研究结果表明,呼叫救护车是一个重大决定,在此之前会有犹豫,并试图自行处理情况。我们的结论是,对宝贵医疗资源使用不当的定义不应仅基于专业人员的观点,还应考虑患者在生命和健康受到威胁时的反应。