Van Tricht Ilse, De Wachter Dirk, Tordoir Jan, Verdonck Pascal
Hydraulics Laboratory, Institute Biomedical Technology, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium.
J Biomech. 2006;39(2):226-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.12.003.
The aim of our study is to investigate with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) whether different arterial anastomotic geometries result in a different hemodynamics at the arterial (AA) and venous anastomosis (VA) of hemodialysis vascular access grafts. We have studied a 6mm graft (CD) and a 4-7 mm graft (TG). A validated three-dimensional CFD model is developed to simulate flow in the two graft types. Only the arterial anastomosis (AA) geometry differs. The boundary conditions applied are a periodic velocity signal at the arterial inlet and a periodic pressure wave at the venous outlet. Flow rate is set to 1,000 ml/min. The time dependent Navier-Stokes equations are solved. Wall shear stress (WSS), wall shear stress gradient (WSSG) and pressure gradient (PG) are calculated. Anastomotic flow is asymmetric although the anastomosis geometry is symmetric. The hemodynamic parameters, WSS, WSSG and PG, values at the suture line of the arterial anastomosis of the TG are at least twice as much as in the CD. Comparing the parameters at the two AA indicate that little flow rate increase introduces the risk of hemolysis in the TG whereas the CD is completely free of hemolysis. The hemodynamic parameter values at the venous anastomosis of the CD are 24 till 35% higher compared to the values of the TG. WSS values (> 3 Pa) in the VA are in the critical range for stenosis development in both graft geometries. The zones where the parameters reach extreme values correspond to the locations where intimal hyperplasia formation is reported in literature. In all anastomoses, the hemodynamic parameter levels are in the range where leucocytes and platelets get activated. Our simulations confirm clinical results where TG did not show a better outcome when compared to the CD.
我们研究的目的是使用计算流体动力学(CFD)来调查不同的动脉吻合几何形状是否会在血液透析血管通路移植物的动脉吻合口(AA)和静脉吻合口(VA)处导致不同的血流动力学。我们研究了一个6毫米的移植物(CD)和一个4 - 7毫米的移植物(TG)。开发了一个经过验证的三维CFD模型来模拟两种移植物类型中的血流。只有动脉吻合口(AA)的几何形状不同。所应用的边界条件是动脉入口处的周期性速度信号和静脉出口处的周期性压力波。流速设定为1000毫升/分钟。求解与时间相关的纳维 - 斯托克斯方程。计算壁面剪切应力(WSS)、壁面剪切应力梯度(WSSG)和压力梯度(PG)。尽管吻合口几何形状是对称的,但吻合口血流是不对称的。TG动脉吻合口缝合线处的血流动力学参数WSS、WSSG和PG值至少是CD的两倍。比较两个AA处的参数表明,流速的微小增加会在TG中引入溶血风险,而CD完全没有溶血。与TG的值相比,CD静脉吻合口处的血流动力学参数值高24%至35%。两种移植物几何形状中,VA处的WSS值(> 3 Pa)都处于狭窄发展的临界范围内。参数达到极值的区域与文献中报道的内膜增生形成的位置相对应。在所有吻合口中,血流动力学参数水平都处于白细胞和血小板被激活的范围内。我们的模拟证实了临床结果,即与CD相比,TG并未显示出更好的结果。