Yucelen A Guldeniz, Rodopman-Arman Ayse, Topcuoglu Volkan, Yazgan M Yanki, Fisek Guler
Department of Psychology, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Compr Psychiatry. 2006 Jan-Feb;47(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.04.005.
To evaluate the interrater reliability of the Turkish version of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) and to measure the clinical efficacy using a clinician-rated impression scale in a clinical outpatient setting.
Data were collected from 19 nonmedicated children and adolescents (6 girls, 13 boys, mean age 14 +/- 2.25 years) with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Interrater reliability was assessed by 3 raters through videotape recordings of evaluation. Correlational analyses were maintained by comparing CY-BOCS scores to self-ratings of Children's Depression Inventory (depression), 20-item Leyton Obsessional Inventory-Child Version (obsessive-compulsive symptoms), and Child Behavior Checklist (parent ratings of behavioral problems). The Clinical Global Impression for OCD was administered to measure the clinical efficacy of CY-BOCS.
Internal consistency was .77 for the total 10 items. The interrater reliabilities, defined as the intraclass correlation for the compulsion subscale, the obsession subscale, and the CY-BOCS total scores were .85, .94, and .89, respectively. Although the sample size was small, CY-BOCS total score was correlated with the Clinical Global Impression score (P < .01) and showed a significantly higher correlation with Leyton Obsessional Inventory-Child Version scores when compared with Children's Depression Inventory and Child Behavior Checklist scores.
Our results indicate that the Turkish version of CY-BOCS yielded good interrater reliability and was significantly correlated with a clinician-rated global impression scale. Although the small sample size hinders a conclusion, CY-BOCS showed significant results regarding validity measures. Therefore, our results support that CY-BOCS has the potential to fulfill the need in clinical research settings.
评估土耳其语版儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫量表(CY-BOCS)的评分者间信度,并在临床门诊环境中使用临床医生评定的印象量表测量其临床疗效。
收集了19名未用药的患有强迫症(OCD)的儿童和青少年(6名女孩,13名男孩,平均年龄14±2.25岁)的数据。由3名评分者通过评估录像来评估评分者间信度。通过比较CY-BOCS评分与儿童抑郁量表(抑郁)的自评、20项莱顿强迫观念量表儿童版(强迫症状)和儿童行为清单(家长对行为问题的评定)进行相关性分析。采用强迫症临床总体印象量表来测量CY-BOCS的临床疗效。
10个项目的总分内部一致性为0.77。强迫分量表、强迫观念分量表和CY-BOCS总分的组内相关系数定义的评分者间信度分别为0.85、0.94和0.89。尽管样本量较小,但CY-BOCS总分与临床总体印象评分相关(P<0.01),并且与莱顿强迫观念量表儿童版评分的相关性显著高于儿童抑郁量表和儿童行为清单评分。
我们的结果表明,土耳其语版CY-BOCS具有良好的评分者间信度,并且与临床医生评定的总体印象量表显著相关。尽管样本量小阻碍了得出结论,但CY-BOCS在效度测量方面显示出显著结果。因此,我们的结果支持CY-BOCS有潜力满足临床研究环境中的需求。