• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Is DFT testing still mandatory?].

作者信息

Neuzner Jörg

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Kassel.

出版信息

Herz. 2005 Nov;30(7):601-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2746-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00059-005-2746-x
PMID:16333585
Abstract

The automatic detection and termination of ventricular fibrillation is still the key function of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. The progress in generator and lead technology has overcome limitations in defibrillation efficacy in early transvenous defibrillator devices. Current, active pectoral biphasic devices provide a high defibrillation efficacy. More than 90% of all patients will meet accepted implantation criteria without any intraoperative system modifications. Is this enough to abandon the intraoperative assessment of defibrillation efficacy? Arguments for abandoning intraoperative device testing include: reduction of perioperative complications, time and cost saving, no worse prognosis for defibrillator patients with borderline defibrillation efficacy, DFT testing might be a barrier to an easy access to ICD implantation. Abandoning intraoperative assessment of defibrillation efficacy may result in inadequate defibrillation safety in up to 9% of all patients. The noninferior outcome of patients with nonadequate defibrillation efficacy is not already proven. Intraoperative device testing could be limited to a small number of VF inductions, the safety of these protocols is well established. A significant time and cost reduction is not really existing. The abandoning of defibrillation testing will not lead to an increase in ICD implant capacity. The intraoperative assessment of defibrillation efficacy should be an important part of ICD implantation.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Is DFT testing still mandatory?].
Herz. 2005 Nov;30(7):601-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2746-x.
2
Defibrillation threshold testing: is it necessary during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation?除颤阈值测试:在植入式心脏复律除颤器植入过程中是否必要?
Med Hypotheses. 2009 Feb;72(2):147-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.09.032. Epub 2008 Nov 5.
3
The dilemma of ICD implant testing.植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入测试的困境
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 May;30(5):675-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00730.x.
4
Intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion: do we really need it?在植入式心脏复律除颤器插入术中进行术中除颤阈值测试:我们真的需要吗?
Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.031.
5
Defibrillation testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in Italian current practice: the Assessment of Long-term Induction clinical ValuE (ALIVE) project.在意大利当前实践中进行植入式心脏复律除颤器植入时的除颤测试:长期诱导临床价值评估(ALIVE)项目。
Am Heart J. 2011 Aug;162(2):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
High defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable defibrillator: how effective is the subcutaneous finger lead?植入式除颤器患者的高除颤阈值:皮下指状电极的效果如何?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):489-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.10.021. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
7
ICD Implantation in infants and small children: the extracardiac technique.婴幼儿植入式心律转复除颤器:心外技术
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Dec;29(12):1319-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00542.x.
8
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
9
The azygos defibrillator lead for elevated defibrillation thresholds: implant technique, lead stability, and patient series.用于提高除颤阈值的奇静脉除颤导线:植入技术、导线稳定性及患者系列研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Nov;31(11):1405-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01203.x.
10
Cardioverter defibrillator implantation without induction of ventricular fibrillation: a single-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial (SIMPLE).心脏转复除颤器植入术无需诱发心室颤动:一项单盲、非劣效性、随机对照试验(SIMPLE)。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 28;385(9970):785-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61903-6. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
ICD implantation without intraoperative testing does not increase the rate of system modifications and does not impair defibrillation efficacy tested in follow-up.未进行术中测试的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入术不会增加系统修改率,也不会损害随访中测试的除颤效果。
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2013 Jun;24(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00399-013-0267-5. Epub 2013 Jun 7.