• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双耳和双耳分听电平随机化对双耳掩蔽级差的影响。

The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.

作者信息

Henning G Bruce, Richards Virginia M, Lentz Jennifer J

机构信息

Hearing Research Center, Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Nov;118(5):3229-40. doi: 10.1121/1.2047167.

DOI:10.1121/1.2047167
PMID:16334902
Abstract

Detection thresholds for tones in narrow-band noise were measured for two binaural configurations: N(o)S(o) and N(o)S(pi). The 30-Hz noise band had a mean overall level of 65 dB SPL and was centered on 250, 500, or 5000 Hz. Signals and noise were simultaneously gated for 500, 110, or 20 ms. Three conditions of level randomization were tested: (1) no randomization; (2) diotic randomization--the stimulus level (common to both ears) was randomly chosen from an uniformly distributed 40-dB range every presentation interval; and (3) dichotic randomization--the stimulus levels for each ear were each independently and randomly chosen from the 40-dB range. Regardless of binaural configuration, level randomization had small effects on thresholds at 500 and 110 ms, implying that binaural masking-level differences (BMLDs) do not depend on interaural level differences for individual stimuli. For 20-ms stimuli, both diotic and dichotic randomization led to markedly poorer performance than at 500- and 110-ms durations; BMLDs diminished with no randomization and dichotic randomization but not with diotic randomization. The loss of BMLDs at 20 ms, with degrees-of-freedom (2WT) approximately 1, implies that changes in intracranial parameters occurring during the course of the observation interval are necessary for BMLDs when mean-level and mean-intracranial-position cues have been made unhelpful.

摘要

针对两种双耳配置

N(o)S(o)和N(o)S(π),测量了窄带噪声中音调的检测阈值。30赫兹的噪声带平均总声压级为65分贝声压级,以250、500或5000赫兹为中心。信号和噪声同时门控500、110或20毫秒。测试了三种电平随机化条件:(1)无随机化;(2)双耳随机化——每次呈现间隔时,刺激电平(双耳共同)从均匀分布的40分贝范围内随机选择;(3)双耳分听随机化——每只耳朵的刺激电平各自独立地从40分贝范围内随机选择。无论双耳配置如何,电平随机化对500和110毫秒时的阈值影响较小,这意味着双耳掩蔽级差(BMLD)不依赖于单个刺激的双耳电平差。对于20毫秒的刺激,双耳随机化和双耳分听随机化导致的表现均明显比500毫秒和110毫秒时长时差;无随机化和双耳分听随机化时BMLD减小,但双耳随机化时没有。20毫秒时BMLD的丧失,自由度(2WT)约为1,这意味着当平均电平和平均颅内位置线索变得无用时,观察间隔期间颅内参数的变化对于BMLD是必要的。

相似文献

1
The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.双耳和双耳分听电平随机化对双耳掩蔽级差的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Nov;118(5):3229-40. doi: 10.1121/1.2047167.
2
Off-frequency BMLD: the role of monaural processing.非频率调制性耳间不平衡:单耳处理的作用。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;787:293-301. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_33.
3
Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers.使用倍增噪声掩蔽器的双耳和双声检测
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Apr;103(4):2100-10. doi: 10.1121/1.421356.
4
Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.通过速率与强度函数测量下丘神经元对双耳掩蔽级差刺激的反应。
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jun;77(6):3085-106. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.3085.
5
Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.儿童双侧人工耳蜗植入:双耳解掩蔽
Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(4):240-7. doi: 10.1159/000190402. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
6
Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.人类双耳掩蔽级差背后的脑干和皮层机制:一项听觉稳态反应研究。
Ear Hear. 2004 Feb;25(1):57-67. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000111257.11898.64.
7
Neural responses in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level differences created by inverting the noise in one ear.下丘对通过反转一只耳朵中的噪声所产生的双耳掩蔽级差的神经反应。
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Aug;84(2):844-52. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.2.844.
8
Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.使用带宽限制测量方法和一种改进的带宽限制测量方法,比较了双耳聆听和双声道聆听条件下的频率分辨率。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Mar;89(3):1331-9. doi: 10.1121/1.400537.
9
Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.老年人双耳时间处理缺陷的皮质相关因素。
Ear Hear. 2018 May/Jun;39(3):594-604. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000518.
10
Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?40 赫兹听觉稳态响应是否显示双耳掩蔽级差?
Ear Hear. 2009 Dec;30(6):713-5. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b61cc8.

引用本文的文献

1
Responses to dichotic tone-in-noise stimuli in the inferior colliculus.下丘对双耳噪声中纯音刺激的反应。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Dec 1;16:997656. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.997656. eCollection 2022.
2
Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.噪声中500赫兹纯音的双耳和双耳分听检测线索随听力损失而变化。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Aug;16(4):507-21. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0518-8. Epub 2015 May 15.
3
A new perspective on binaural integration using response time methodology: super capacity revealed in conditions of binaural masking release.
双耳整合的新视角:在双耳掩蔽释放条件下揭示的超能力
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 22;8:641. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00641. eCollection 2014.
4
Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies. 在心理物理学研究中分离主要和次要线索的贡献。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Oct;119(4):770-88. doi: 10.1037/a0029343. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
5
On the choice of adequate randomization ranges for limiting the use of unwanted cues in same-different, dual-pair, and oddity tasks.关于在相同-不同、双对和奇偶数任务中选择适当的随机化范围以限制不必要线索的使用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Feb;72(2):538-47. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.2.538.