Pang Samantha M C, Chan Kin-sang, Chung Betty P M, Lau Kam-shing, Leung Edward M F, Leung Amanda W K, Chan Helen Y L, Chan Tony M F
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China.
J Palliat Care. 2005 Autumn;21(3):180-7.
Given the limitations of existing health-related quality-of-life (QOL) measures in capturing the end-of-life experience of patients with advanced chronic diseases, an empirically grounded instrument, the quality-of-life concerns in the end of life questionnaire (QOLC-E), was developed. Though it was built on the McGill quality of life questionnaire (MQOL), its sphere is more holistic and culturally specific for the Chinese patients in Hong Kong. One hundred and forty-nine patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or metastatic cancer completed the questionnaire. Seven factors (28 items) which emerged from the factor analysis were grouped into four positive (support, value of life, food-related concerns, and healthcare concerns) and four negative (physical discomfort, negative emotions, sense of alienation, and existential distress) subscales. Good internal consistency and concurrent validity were shown. The results also revealed that these two groups of patients had similar QOL concerns. The validity of applying QOLC-E as an outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative and psychoexistential interventions has yet to be tested.
鉴于现有健康相关生活质量(QOL)测量方法在捕捉晚期慢性病患者临终体验方面存在局限性,我们开发了一种基于实证的工具——临终生活质量关注问卷(QOLC-E)。尽管它是在麦吉尔生活质量问卷(MQOL)的基础上构建的,但其范围对于香港的中国患者而言更为全面且具有文化特异性。149例晚期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或转移性癌症患者完成了该问卷。通过因子分析得出的七个因子(28个条目)被归为四个积极子量表(支持、生命价值、饮食相关关注和医疗保健关注)和四个消极子量表(身体不适、消极情绪、疏离感和存在性痛苦)。结果显示该问卷具有良好的内部一致性和同时效度。研究结果还表明,这两组患者在生活质量关注方面相似。将QOLC-E作为评估姑息治疗和心理存在干预效果的结局指标的有效性尚未得到检验。