• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

规范荷兰药品市场:提高效率还是控制成本?

Regulating the Dutch pharmaceutical market: improving efficiency or controlling costs?

作者信息

de Wolf Peter, Brouwer Werner B F, Rutten Frans F H

机构信息

Wageningen Business School, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;20(4):351-74. doi: 10.1002/hpm.819.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.819
PMID:16335082
Abstract

In this paper, we describe the Dutch pharmaceutical market, which is heavily regulated by the government. Through the regulation of prices and promoting prudent use, the Dutch government tries to bring down the cost of pharmaceuticals, which increases every year at a higher rate than total health care expenditure. The complex system of regulation, especially aimed at cost containment, is not very effective, particularly with respect to controlling outpatient pharmaceutical expenditure. Moreover, the system has few incentives towards efficiency. Though the market share of generic pharmaceuticals is rapidly growing, pharmaceutical expenditure has not decreased accordingly. The discounts offered by wholesalers of generic products to pharmacists produce private rather than societal gains from generic prescriptions. Dismantling the current regulatory system, boosting competition and efficiency with insurers in a leading role, seems to be the way forward.

摘要

在本文中,我们描述了荷兰的药品市场,该市场受到政府的严格监管。通过价格调控和促进合理用药,荷兰政府试图降低药品成本,药品成本每年的增长速度高于医疗保健总支出。复杂的监管体系,尤其是旨在控制成本的体系,效果并不理想,在控制门诊药品支出方面尤为如此。此外,该体系对提高效率的激励措施很少。尽管仿制药的市场份额迅速增长,但药品支出并未相应减少。仿制药批发商给药剂师的折扣带来的是私人收益,而非仿制药处方带来的社会收益。拆除当前的监管体系,以保险公司为主导增强竞争和效率,似乎是前进的方向。

相似文献

1
Regulating the Dutch pharmaceutical market: improving efficiency or controlling costs?规范荷兰药品市场:提高效率还是控制成本?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;20(4):351-74. doi: 10.1002/hpm.819.
2
Regulating pharmaceutical markets: improving efficiency and controlling costs in the UK.规范药品市场:提高英国药品市场的效率并控制成本
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;20(4):375-98. doi: 10.1002/hpm.820.
3
Pharmaceutical policy in the Netherlands: from price regulation towards managed competition.荷兰的药品政策:从价格监管走向管理式竞争。
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2010;22:53-76. doi: 10.1108/s0731-2199(2010)0000022006.
4
Regulation of pharmaceutical markets in Germany: improving efficiency and controlling expenditures?德国药品市场监管:提高效率与控制支出?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;20(4):329-49. doi: 10.1002/hpm.818.
5
European healthcare policies for controlling drug expenditure.欧洲控制药品支出的医疗政策。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(2):89-103. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321020-00002.
6
The impact of repeated cost containment policies on pharmaceutical expenditure: experience in Spain.重复的成本控制政策对药品支出的影响:西班牙的经验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;12(6):563-73. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0271-1. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
7
The UK pharmaceutical market. An overview.英国制药市场。概述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10 Suppl 2:14-25. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600102-00005.
8
The drug budget silo mentality: the French case.药品预算的孤立思维:以法国为例。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S10-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.2.x.
9
Pharmaceutical regulation in Greece at the crossroad of change: economic, political and constitutional considerations for a new regulatory paradigm.处于变革十字路口的希腊药品监管:新监管范式的经济、政治和宪法考量
Health Policy. 2007 Jun;82(1):116-29. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
10
Reforms in the Greek pharmaceutical market during the financial crisis.希腊金融危机期间的医药市场改革。
Health Policy. 2013 Jan;109(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of transparent online open procurement on prices, volumes, and costs of medicines: an interrupted time series study in Ningxia, China.透明在线公开采购对药品价格、数量和成本的影响:中国宁夏的一项中断时间序列研究
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 20;15:1362374. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1362374. eCollection 2024.
2
A quasi-experimental study of the volume-based procurement (VBP) effect on antiviral medications of hepatitis B virus in China.一项关于中国基于量的采购(VBP)对乙型肝炎病毒抗病毒药物影响的准实验研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 5;14:984794. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.984794. eCollection 2023.
3
The Effects of the National Centralized Drug Purchasing Pilot Program on Nucleos(t)ide Analogs in Shenzhen City: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
国家集中带量采购试点对深圳市核苷(酸)类似物使用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 25;9:718013. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.718013. eCollection 2021.
4
Public funding of pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands: investigating the effect of evidence, process and context on CVZ decision-making.荷兰药品的公共资金投入:探究证据、流程及背景对药品评估委员会决策的影响
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Sep;15(7):681-95. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0514-z. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
5
Lost productivity in four European countries among patients with rheumatic disorders: are absenteeism and presenteeism transferable?四个欧洲国家风湿性疾病患者的生产力损失:旷工和病休能否转移?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Sep 1;30(9):795-807. doi: 10.2165/11591520-000000000-00000.
6
Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?社会价值观在医疗资源配置中的作用:是否全在于健康收益?
Patient. 2011;4(4):207-25. doi: 10.2165/11588880-000000000-00000.
7
Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.全球卫生技术资金决策过程:大同小异。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jun;29(6):475-95. doi: 10.2165/11586420-000000000-00000.
8
Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers' channeling incentives on pharmacy choice.哪些首选供应商是真正被首选的?保险公司引导激励措施对药房选择的有效性。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009 Dec;9(4):347-66. doi: 10.1007/s10754-009-9055-5. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
9
The last decade of Italian pharmaceutical policy: instability or consolidation?意大利制药政策的过去十年:动荡还是巩固?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(1):5-15. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826010-00002.