• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

规范药品市场:提高英国药品市场的效率并控制成本

Regulating pharmaceutical markets: improving efficiency and controlling costs in the UK.

作者信息

Walley Tom, Mrazek Monique, Mossialos Elias

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, 70 Pembrooke Place, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;20(4):375-98. doi: 10.1002/hpm.820.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.820
PMID:16335083
Abstract

UK government policy on pharmaceuticals is broadly integrated across the whole of health care policy. In the early 1990s, cost containment was emphasized, through budget holding by doctors to ensure clinical acceptability. From 2000 onwards, increased government funding for the NHS has allowed expansion of services and prescribing in areas of public health importance, but has been coupled with increased accountability and ambitious targets for the process of care and health outcomes. Standards for care are set in national guidelines including those from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE recommends or rejects new technologies to the NHS for their clinical value and cost effectiveness. Although following its advice is mandatory, evidence so far suggests that it has been only partly successful at improving services and eliminating variations. GP prescribing is monitored by Primary Care Organisations (PCO) which also hold the medicines budget. They may provide incentives to GPs for meeting targets in quality or expenditure. The UK government regulates the prices of generics but not of branded medicines; instead it regulates the profitability of the pharmaceutical industry. This arrangement seems to have been successful both at maintaining a major employer and export earner, and in limiting high drug expenditure.

摘要

英国政府的药品政策在很大程度上融入了整个医疗保健政策之中。在20世纪90年代初,重点是成本控制,通过医生掌握预算来确保临床可接受性。从2000年起,政府对国民保健制度增加的资金投入使得在具有公共卫生重要性的领域能够扩大服务和开药范围,但同时也伴随着问责制的加强以及对医疗过程和健康结果设定了雄心勃勃的目标。护理标准在国家指南中制定,包括来自国家临床优化研究所(NICE)的指南。NICE根据新技术的临床价值和成本效益向国民保健制度推荐或拒绝新技术。虽然遵循其建议是强制性的,但迄今为止的证据表明,它在改善服务和消除差异方面仅取得了部分成功。全科医生的开药情况由初级保健组织(PCO)监测,PCO也掌管药品预算。它们可能会为全科医生实现质量或支出目标提供激励措施。英国政府对仿制药价格进行监管,但不对品牌药价格进行监管;相反,它对制药行业的盈利能力进行监管。这种安排似乎在维持一个主要雇主和出口创汇企业方面以及在限制高额药品支出方面都取得了成功。

相似文献

1
Regulating pharmaceutical markets: improving efficiency and controlling costs in the UK.规范药品市场:提高英国药品市场的效率并控制成本
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;20(4):375-98. doi: 10.1002/hpm.820.
2
Regulating the Dutch pharmaceutical market: improving efficiency or controlling costs?规范荷兰药品市场:提高效率还是控制成本?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;20(4):351-74. doi: 10.1002/hpm.819.
3
The UK pharmaceutical market. An overview.英国制药市场。概述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996;10 Suppl 2:14-25. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199600102-00005.
4
Regulation of pharmaceutical markets in Germany: improving efficiency and controlling expenditures?德国药品市场监管:提高效率与控制支出?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2005 Oct-Dec;20(4):329-49. doi: 10.1002/hpm.818.
5
The drug budget silo mentality: the French case.药品预算的孤立思维:以法国为例。
Value Health. 2003 Jul-Aug;6 Suppl 1:S10-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.6.s1.2.x.
6
Government funding of the UK National Health Service: what does the historical record reveal?英国国民医疗服务体系的政府资金投入:历史记录揭示了什么?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Apr;4(2):79-89. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400205.
7
The management of the cost and utilisation of pharmaceuticals in the United Kingdom.英国药品成本与使用情况的管理
Health Policy. 1997 Sep;41 Suppl:S27-43. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00051-1.
8
New medicines in primary care: a review of influences on general practitioner prescribing.基层医疗中的新药:对全科医生处方影响的综述
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Feb;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2008.00875.x.
9
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
10
European healthcare policies for controlling drug expenditure.欧洲控制药品支出的医疗政策。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(2):89-103. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321020-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.药品政策:针对开处方者的经济激励措施的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.
2
Factors affecting the uptake of new medicines: a systematic literature review.影响新药采用的因素:一项系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 20;14:469. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-469.
3
Ethical issues raised by the introduction of payment for performance in France.法国引入按绩效付费所引发的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Aug;38(8):485-91. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100159. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
4
Impact of European pharmaceutical price regulation on generic price competition: a review.欧洲药品价格管制对仿制药价格竞争的影响:综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(8):649-63. doi: 10.2165/11535360-000000000-00000.
5
Having your cake and eating it: office of fair trading proposal for funding new drugs to benefit patients and innovative companies.鱼与熊掌兼得:公平交易办公室为资助新药以使患者和创新公司受益的提议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(2):91-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826020-00001.
6
The last decade of Italian pharmaceutical policy: instability or consolidation?意大利制药政策的过去十年:动荡还是巩固?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(1):5-15. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826010-00002.