Cleary-Goldman Jane, Cornelisse Kelly, Simpson Lynn L, Robinson Julian N
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, New York Presbyterian Medical Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 620 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Am J Perinatol. 2005 May;22(4):217-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866606.
The objective of this study was to determine patient satisfaction with delivery experience in a pregnancy subsequent to primary cesarean and to evaluate knowledge about a trial of labor after cesarean in patients enrolled in a formal vaginal birth after cesarean educational program. During a 12-month period, women with a history of cesarean delivery who were participating in a formal counseling program regarding the risks and benefits of vaginal birth after cesarean were surveyed in the antepartum and postpartum periods. Patient demographics, past birth experience, understanding of the risks and benefits of vaginal birth after cesarean, pregnancy outcomes, and ratings of satisfaction and recovery following the current delivery were collected. Patients were divided into four groups depending on their mode of delivery in the current pregnancy: group 1 succeeded at vaginal birth, group 2 underwent repeat cesarean in labor, group 3 delivered by cesarean before labor, and group 4 chose repeat cesarean. Ninety-five patients enrolled in the study. There were 26 patients in group 1, 18 patients in group 2, 16 patients in group 3, and 35 patients in group 4. The four groups had significant differences in patient satisfaction following the current delivery compared with the previous cesarean delivery ( p = 0.001). The patients who had a successful trial of labor exhibited the largest median change in score. The patients who delivered by cesarean during labor had the smallest median change in score. Nonetheless, 92% of these patients were pleased that they had attempted a vaginal birth. When questioned about the risks associated with a trial of labor after cesarean delivery, 92% of postpartum patients answered all questions correctly. Patients participating in a formal counseling program exhibit a high level of understanding about the risks and benefits of a trial of labor. Although the most satisfied patients were those who succeeded at vaginal birth, most women valued the opportunity to attempt a vaginal birth regardless of outcome.
本研究的目的是确定初次剖宫产术后再次妊娠的患者对分娩体验的满意度,并评估参加剖宫产术后阴道分娩正式教育项目的患者对剖宫产术后试产的了解情况。在12个月的时间里,对有剖宫产史且正在参加关于剖宫产术后阴道分娩风险和益处的正式咨询项目的女性进行了产前和产后调查。收集了患者的人口统计学资料、既往分娩经历、对剖宫产术后阴道分娩风险和益处的理解、妊娠结局以及本次分娩后的满意度和恢复评分。根据患者本次妊娠的分娩方式将其分为四组:第1组成功进行阴道分娩,第2组在产程中接受再次剖宫产,第3组在临产前剖宫产,第4组选择再次剖宫产。95名患者参与了本研究。第1组有26名患者,第2组有18名患者,第3组有16名患者,第4组有35名患者。与前次剖宫产相比,四组患者对本次分娩后的满意度存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。试产成功的患者得分中位数变化最大。产程中剖宫产的患者得分中位数变化最小。尽管如此,这些患者中有92%对尝试阴道分娩感到满意。当被问及剖宫产术后试产的相关风险时,92%的产后患者回答所有问题正确。参加正式咨询项目的患者对试产的风险和益处表现出较高的理解水平。虽然最满意的患者是那些成功进行阴道分娩的患者,但大多数女性无论结果如何都重视尝试阴道分娩的机会。