Commentary--improving diabetes care by combating clinical inertia.
作者信息
O'Connor Patrick J
机构信息
HealthPartners Research Foundation, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA.
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1854-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00437.x.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary--improving diabetes care by combating clinical inertia.评论——通过克服临床惰性改善糖尿病护理。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1854-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00437.x.
2
Comparing care of Pennsylvania patients with diabetes to national standards.将宾夕法尼亚州糖尿病患者的护理情况与国家标准进行比较。
Pa Med. 1990 Jan;93(1):26.
3
Physicians help achieve quality diabetes care.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2002 Dec;9(12):68-70.
4
Using performance feedback to change provider behavior.利用绩效反馈来改变医疗服务提供者的行为。
Dis Manag Advis. 2006 Apr;12(4):46-8, 37.
5
Factors associated with clinical inertia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients treated with metformin monotherapy.与二甲双胍单药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者临床惰性相关的因素。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Dec;35(12):2063-2070. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1648116. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
6
The effects of patient volume on the quality of diabetic care for Medicare beneficiaries.患者数量对医疗保险受益人的糖尿病护理质量的影响。
Med Care. 2006 Dec;44(12):1073-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000233685.22497.cf.
7
Improving diabetes care in my practice.改善我诊所的糖尿病护理。
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Nov;53(11):1897.
8
Patient complexity and diabetes quality of care in rural settings.农村地区患者病情复杂程度与糖尿病医疗质量。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Mar;103(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30297-2.
9
10
Electronic clinical reminder and quality of primary diabetes care.电子临床提醒与原发性糖尿病护理质量
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):150-157. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
引用本文的文献
1
Addressing Clinical Inertia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review.解决 2 型糖尿病治疗惰性问题：综述
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):1735-1745. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0819-5. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
2
Variation in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use in Patients With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇≥190mg/dL患者降脂治疗使用情况的差异：来自国家心血管数据注册库 - 实践创新与临床卓越注册库的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 May;11(5):e004652. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004652.
3
Family physician clinical inertia in glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者血糖控制中家庭医生的临床惰性
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Feb 5;21:403-11. doi: 10.12659/MSM.892248.
4
Implementation of a chronic illness model for diabetes care in a family medicine residency program.在家庭医学住院医师培训计划中实施糖尿病护理慢性病模式。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Sep;25 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S615-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1431-9.
5
Multiple uncontrolled conditions and blood pressure medication intensification: an observational study.多种未控制的情况和血压药物强化：一项观察性研究。
Implement Sci. 2010 Jul 19;5:55. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-55.
6
Comparing methods of measuring treatment intensification in hypertension care.比较高血压护理中测量治疗强化的方法。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Jul;2(4):385-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.838649. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
7
Sustained hyperglycemia among patients with diabetes: what matters when action is needed?糖尿病患者的持续性高血糖：需要采取行动时，什么才是重要的？
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1447-52. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2028.
8
Simulated physician learning intervention to improve safety and quality of diabetes care: a randomized trial.模拟医生学习干预以提高糖尿病护理的安全性和质量：一项随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Apr;32(4):585-90. doi: 10.2337/dc08-0944. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
9
Treatment intensification and blood glucose control among hospitalized diabetic patients.住院糖尿病患者的治疗强化与血糖控制
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):184-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0468-x. Epub 2007 Dec 8.
10
Reasons for not intensifying medications: differentiating "clinical inertia" from appropriate care.不强化药物治疗的原因：区分“临床惰性”与适当治疗。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22(12):1648-55. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0433-8. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
本文引用的文献
1
Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care.制定糖尿病护理中临床惰性的质量衡量标准。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 1):1836-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00436.x.
2
When there is too much to do: how practicing physicians prioritize among recommended interventions.当有太多事情要做时：执业医师如何在推荐的干预措施中进行优先级排序。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jun;19(6):646-53. doi: 10.1007/s11606-004-0058-0.
3
Do all components of the chronic care model contribute equally to quality improvement?慢性病护理模式的所有组成部分对质量改进的贡献是否相同？
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Jun;30(6):303-9. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30034-1.
4
Failure of computerized treatment suggestions to improve health outcomes of outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial.计算机化治疗建议未能改善单纯性高血压门诊患者的健康结局：一项随机对照试验的结果。
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Mar;24(3):324-37. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.4.324.33173.
5
Clinical inertia in the management of Type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors.2型糖尿病代谢危险因素管理中的临床惰性
Diabet Med. 2004 Feb;21(2):150-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01095.x.
6
Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.初级保健中管理心脏病的计算机化指南的效果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Dec;18(12):967-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30635.x.
7
Overcome clinical inertia to control systolic blood pressure.克服临床惰性以控制收缩压。
Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(22):2677-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.22.2677.
8
Setting evidence-based priorities for diabetes care improvement.为改善糖尿病护理设定基于证据的优先事项。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Aug;15(4):283-5. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg062.
9
Electronic medical records and diabetes care improvement: are we waiting for Godot?电子病历与糖尿病护理改善：我们在等待戈多吗？
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):942-3. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.942.
10
A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project.基于网络的糖尿病疾病管理对照试验：麻省总医院糖尿病初级保健改善项目。
Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):750-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.750.
Zotero 插件