• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蛋白质中平行β-折叠中的氨基酸配对偏好

Amino acid pairing preferences in parallel beta-sheets in proteins.

作者信息

Fooks H M, Martin A C R, Woolfson D N, Sessions R B, Hutchinson E G

机构信息

School of Animal & Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 228, Reading RG6 6AJ, UK.

出版信息

J Mol Biol. 2006 Feb 10;356(1):32-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.008. Epub 2005 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.008
PMID:16337654
Abstract

Statistical approaches have been applied to examine amino acid pairing preferences within parallel beta-sheets. The main chain hydrogen bonding pattern in parallel beta-sheets means that, for each residue pair, only one of the residues is involved in main chain hydrogen bonding with the strand containing the partner residue. We call this the hydrogen bonded (HB) residue and the partner residue the non-hydrogen bonded (nHB) residue, and differentiate between the favorability of a pair and that of its reverse pair, e.g. Asn(HB)-Thr(nHB)versus Thr(HB)-Asn(nHB). Significantly (p < or = 0.000001) favoured pairings were rationalised using stereochemical arguments. For instance, Asn(HB)-Thr(nHB) and Arg(HB)-Thr(nHB) were favoured pairs, where the residues adopted favoured chi1 rotamer positions that allowed side-chain interactions to occur. In contrast, Thr(HB)-Asn(nHB) and Thr(HB)-Arg(nHB) were not significantly favoured, and could only form side-chain interactions if the residues involved adopted less favourable chi1 conformations. The favourability of hydrophobic pairs e.g. Ile(HB)-Ile(nHB), Val(HB)-Val(nHB) and Leu(HB)-Ile(nHB) was explained by the residues adopting their most preferred chi1 and chi2 conformations, which enabled them to form nested arrangements. Cysteine-cysteine pairs are significantly favoured, although these do not form intrasheet disulphide bridges. Interactions between positively and negatively charged residues were asymmetrically preferred: those with the negatively charged residue at the HB position were more favoured. This trend was accounted for by the presence of general electrostatic interactions, which, based on analysis of distances between charged atoms, were likely to be stronger when the negatively charged residue is the HB partner. The Arg(HB)-Asp(nHB) interaction was an exception to this trend and its favorability was rationalised by the formation of specific side-chain interactions. This research provides rules that could be applied to protein structure prediction, comparative modelling and protein engineering and design. The methods used to analyse the pairing preferences are automated and detailed results are available (http://www.rubic.rdg.ac.uk/betapairprefsparallel/).

摘要

统计方法已被用于研究平行β折叠内的氨基酸配对偏好。平行β折叠中的主链氢键模式意味着,对于每一对残基,只有一个残基参与与含有配对残基的链的主链氢键形成。我们将此残基称为氢键结合(HB)残基,将配对残基称为非氢键结合(nHB)残基,并区分一对及其反向对的偏好性,例如天冬酰胺(HB)-苏氨酸(nHB)与苏氨酸(HB)-天冬酰胺(nHB)。使用立体化学论据对显著(p≤0.000001)偏好的配对进行了合理化解释。例如,天冬酰胺(HB)-苏氨酸(nHB)和精氨酸(HB)-苏氨酸(nHB)是偏好对,其中残基采用了允许侧链相互作用发生的偏好χ1旋转异构体位置。相比之下,苏氨酸(HB)-天冬酰胺(nHB)和苏氨酸(HB)-精氨酸(nHB)没有显著偏好,并且只有当所涉及的残基采用不太有利的χ1构象时才能形成侧链相互作用。疏水对的偏好性,例如异亮氨酸(HB)-异亮氨酸(nHB)、缬氨酸(HB)-缬氨酸(nHB)和亮氨酸(HB)-异亮氨酸(nHB),是由残基采用其最优选的χ1和χ2构象来解释的,这使它们能够形成嵌套排列。半胱氨酸-半胱氨酸对受到显著偏好,尽管它们不会形成片层内二硫键。带正电和带负电残基之间的相互作用不对称地受到偏好:那些带负电残基处于HB位置的相互作用更受青睐。这种趋势是由一般静电相互作用的存在所解释的,基于对带电原子之间距离的分析,当带负电残基是HB配对伙伴时,静电相互作用可能更强。精氨酸(HB)-天冬氨酸(nHB)相互作用是这种趋势的一个例外,其偏好性通过特定侧链相互作用的形成而合理化。这项研究提供了可应用于蛋白质结构预测、比较建模以及蛋白质工程和设计的规则。用于分析配对偏好的方法是自动化的,并且可获得详细结果(http://www.rubic.rdg.ac.uk/betapairprefsparallel/)。

相似文献

1
Amino acid pairing preferences in parallel beta-sheets in proteins.蛋白质中平行β-折叠中的氨基酸配对偏好
J Mol Biol. 2006 Feb 10;356(1):32-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.008. Epub 2005 Nov 22.
2
Effects of side-chain characteristics on stability and oligomerization state of a de novo-designed model coiled-coil: 20 amino acid substitutions in position "d".侧链特性对全新设计的模型卷曲螺旋的稳定性和寡聚化状态的影响:“d”位的20个氨基酸替换
J Mol Biol. 2000 Jul 7;300(2):377-402. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3866.
3
Free energies of amino acid side-chain rotamers in alpha-helices, beta-sheets and alpha-helix N-caps.α-螺旋、β-折叠和α-螺旋N端帽中氨基酸侧链旋转异构体的自由能
J Mol Biol. 1997 Sep 26;272(3):456-64. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1250.
4
Amino acid conformational preferences and solvation of polar backbone atoms in peptides and proteins.肽和蛋白质中氨基酸的构象偏好以及极性主链原子的溶剂化作用。
J Mol Biol. 2000 Jul 28;300(5):1335-59. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3901.
5
An analysis of side chain interactions and pair correlations within antiparallel beta-sheets: the differences between backbone hydrogen-bonded and non-hydrogen-bonded residue pairs.反平行β-折叠中侧链相互作用和对相关性的分析:主链氢键结合和非氢键结合残基对之间的差异。
Proteins. 1995 Jun;22(2):119-31. doi: 10.1002/prot.340220205.
6
Determinants of strand register in antiparallel beta-sheets of proteins.蛋白质反平行β折叠中链对齐的决定因素。
Protein Sci. 1998 Nov;7(11):2287-300. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560071106.
7
The occurrence of C--H...O hydrogen bonds in alpha-helices and helix termini in globular proteins.球状蛋白质中α螺旋及螺旋末端C--H...O氢键的存在情况。
Proteins. 2004 Sep 1;56(4):768-81. doi: 10.1002/prot.20152.
8
Design of helix ends. Amino acid preferences, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions.螺旋末端的设计。氨基酸偏好、氢键和静电相互作用。
Int J Pept Protein Res. 1993 May;41(5):499-511.
9
Statistical analysis of atomic contacts at RNA-protein interfaces.RNA-蛋白质界面处原子接触的统计分析。
J Mol Recognit. 2001 Jul-Aug;14(4):199-214. doi: 10.1002/jmr.534.
10
Effect of charged amino acid side chain length on lateral cross-strand interactions between carboxylate-containing residues and lysine analogues in a β-hairpin.带电荷氨基酸侧链长度对β发夹中环状结构中含羧基残基与赖氨酸类似物之间的侧向跨链相互作用的影响。
Biochemistry. 2013 Dec 23;52(51):9212-22. doi: 10.1021/bi400974x. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
From Concepts to Inhibitors: A Blueprint for Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions.从概念到抑制剂:靶向蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用的蓝图
Chem Rev. 2025 Jul 23;125(14):6819-6869. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00046. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Construction of Targeting-Peptide-Based Imaging Reagents and Their Application in Bioimaging.基于靶向肽的成像试剂的构建及其在生物成像中的应用。
Chem Biomed Imaging. 2023 Dec 4;2(4):233-249. doi: 10.1021/cbmi.3c00104. eCollection 2024 Apr 22.
3
Macrocyclic β-Sheets Stabilized by Hydrogen Bond Surrogates.
由氢键类似物稳定的大环 β-折叠
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023 Oct 9;62(41):e202303943. doi: 10.1002/anie.202303943. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
4
Diastereomeric multi-chiral pendant groups: Their key role in stimuli-responsive polymeric responses.非对映多手性侧基:在刺激响应型聚合物响应中的关键作用。
Chirality. 2023 Mar;35(3):172-177. doi: 10.1002/chir.23530. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
5
Elucidating the Supramolecular Copolymerization of N- and C-Centered Benzene-1,3,5-Tricarboxamides: The Role of Parallel and Antiparallel Packing of Amide Groups in the Copolymer Microstructure.阐明以氮和碳为中心的苯-1,3,5-三羧酰胺的超分子共聚合:酰胺基团的平行和反平行堆积在共聚物微观结构中的作用。
Chemistry. 2022 Jan 3;28(1):e202103691. doi: 10.1002/chem.202103691. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
A reactive center loop-based prediction platform to enhance the design of therapeutic SERPINs.基于反应中心环的预测平台,用于增强治疗性丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂的设计。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 9;118(45). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108458118.
7
Analysis of Baboon IAPP Provides Insight into Amyloidogenicity and Cytotoxicity of Human IAPP.对狒狒胰岛淀粉样多肽的分析有助于深入了解人胰岛淀粉样多肽的淀粉样变性和细胞毒性。
Biophys J. 2020 Mar 10;118(5):1142-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.12.027. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
8
Propensities of Amino Acid Pairings in Secondary Structure of Globular Proteins.球状蛋白质二级结构中氨基酸配对倾向。
Protein J. 2020 Feb;39(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s10930-020-09880-6.
9
Improved Stability and Tunable Functionalization of Parallel β-Sheets via Multicomponent N-Alkylation of the Turn Moiety.通过转角部位的多组分 N-烷基化反应提高平行 β-折叠结构的稳定性和可调节功能化。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020 Jan 2;59(1):259-263. doi: 10.1002/anie.201912095. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
10
Physicochemical Position-Dependent Properties in the Protein Secondary Structures.蛋白质二级结构中物理化学位置依赖性特性
Iran Biomed J. 2019 Jul;23(4):253-61. doi: 10.29252/.23.4.253. Epub 2019 Apr 7.