Suppr超能文献

负荷重量的可辨别性:对手动搬运心理物理学方法的启示。

Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting.

作者信息

Karwowski W, Shumate C, Yates J W, Pongpatana N

机构信息

Center for Industrial Ergonomics, University of Louisville, Kentucky 40292.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 1992 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):729-44. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967359.

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to investigate human ability to discriminate between different levels of load heaviness in manual lifting. Twelve male college students participated in the laboratory experiment. Twenty-eight sequences of five boxes that weighed from 5 to 64 lbs (2.27-29.1 kg) were used. The subjects were asked to arrange boxes in each sequence in order of the perceived (increasing or decreasing) heaviness, i.e., from lightest to the heaviest box, or from heaviest to the lightest box. The subjects were also asked to assign linguistic descriptors of perceived load heaviness to each box in the sequence, and to indicate the confidence levels regarding correctness of the assigned box order and assignment of linguistic values. The independent variables included magnitude of weight and load differential between the successive weights in a sequence. The number of sequential ordering errors, assignment of linguistic variables, and estimated confidence levels were highly dependent on the load differential and weight range. It was concluded that in order to assure reliable results of the psychophysical approach to determining the values of maximum acceptable weight of lift, the adjustment process for male subjects should require using small weights of at least 4 lbs (1.8 kg) to be added or removed from the lifted box. The results of this study also suggest that the error rate in load discriminability can be controlled below the 10% level, if the relative difference in weight between successive boxes lifted is at least 12%. Given the above findings, it is suggested that usefulness of some of the recommendations for setting safe limits for manual lifting tasks, which were reached based on the psychophysical approach and broadly reported in the past, may need to be carefully re-examined. Finally, this study showed that the Weber fraction for load heaviness over the range of lifted weights from 8.6 to 29.1 kg is between 0.03 and 0.04.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是调查人类在手动提举时区分不同负荷重量水平的能力。12名男大学生参与了实验室实验。使用了28组由5至64磅(2.27至29.1千克)重的五个箱子组成的序列。要求受试者将每个序列中的箱子按照感知到的(递增或递减)重量顺序排列,即从最轻的箱子到最重的箱子,或者从最重的箱子到最轻的箱子。还要求受试者为序列中的每个箱子赋予感知负荷重量的语言描述,并指出对所分配的箱子顺序和语言值分配正确性的置信水平。自变量包括重量大小和序列中连续重量之间的负荷差异。序列排序错误的数量、语言变量的分配以及估计的置信水平高度依赖于负荷差异和重量范围。得出的结论是,为了确保通过心理物理学方法确定最大可接受提举重量值的可靠结果,男性受试者的调整过程应要求从被提举的箱子中添加或移除至少4磅(1.8千克)的小重量。本研究结果还表明,如果连续提举的箱子之间的重量相对差异至少为12%,则负荷可辨别性的错误率可以控制在10%以下。鉴于上述发现,有人建议,过去基于心理物理学方法得出并广泛报道的一些关于设定手动提举任务安全极限的建议的实用性,可能需要仔细重新审视。最后,本研究表明,在8.6至29.1千克的提举重量范围内,负荷重量的韦伯分数在0.03至0.04之间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验