Lapinskiene Asta, Martinkus Povilas, Rebzdaite Vilija
Klaipeda University, School of Maritime Technology, Department of Technological Processes, Bijūnu St. 17, Klaipeda LT-91225, Lithuania.
Environ Pollut. 2006 Aug;142(3):432-7. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.023. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
The goal of this study was to compare diesel fuel to biodiesel fuel by determining the toxicity of analyzed materials and by quantitatively evaluating the microbial transformation of these materials in non-adapted aerated soil. The toxicity levels were determined by measuring the respiration of soil microorganisms as well as the activity of soil dehydrogenases. The quantitative evaluation of biotransformation of analyzed materials was based on the principle of balancing carbon in the following final products: (a) carbon dioxide; (b) humus compounds; (c) the remainder of non-biodegraded analyzed material; and (d) intermediate biodegradation products and the biomass of microorganisms. The results of these studies indicate that diesel fuel has toxic properties at concentrations above 3% (w/w), while biodiesel fuel has none up to a concentration of 12% (w/w). The diesel fuel is more resistant to biodegradation and produces more humus products. The biodiesel is easily biotransformed.
本研究的目的是通过测定分析材料的毒性,并定量评估这些材料在未适应的曝气土壤中的微生物转化情况,来比较柴油和生物柴油。通过测量土壤微生物的呼吸作用以及土壤脱氢酶的活性来确定毒性水平。分析材料生物转化的定量评估基于以下最终产物中碳平衡的原理:(a)二氧化碳;(b)腐殖质化合物;(c)未生物降解的分析材料的剩余部分;(d)中间生物降解产物和微生物生物量。这些研究结果表明,柴油在浓度高于3%(w/w)时具有毒性,而生物柴油在浓度高达12%(w/w)时无毒。柴油对生物降解的抵抗力更强,产生的腐殖质产物更多。生物柴油易于生物转化。