Lee Eun Suk, Lee Sang Yeul, Jeong Soo Yong, Moon Yeon Sung, Chin Hee Seung, Cho Seon Jae, Oh Jung Hyub
Department of Ophthalmology, Inha University College of Medicine, Shinheung-Dong, Jung-Gu, Incheon, Korea.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Oct;31(10):1960-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.062.
To determine the ideal target refraction to optimize visual acuity (VA) and patient satisfaction after implantation of Array SA40N multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (AMO).
Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
The study prospectively enrolled 188 eyes of 163 patients and assigned them to 1 of 3 groups according to their postoperative refractive status: Group 1 (43 myopic eyes, -0.50 diopter [D] to -1.50 D), Group 2 (114 emmetropic eyes, -0.50 D to +0.50 D) and Group 3 (31 hyperopic eyes, +0.50 D to +1.50 D). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), UCDVA under glare conditions, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction were then compared between the 3 groups.
Three months postoperatively, UCDVA, UCNVA, UCDVA under glare conditions, and contrast sensitivity were good in all eyes and more than 72% of patients never wore glasses for near vision. In Group 2, UCDVA was significantly better (0.74 +/- 0.20; P<.05) compared with Groups 1 and 3 (0.40 +/- 0.24 and 0.38 +/- 0.30, respectively); UCNVA was also significantly better in Group 2 (0.68 +/- 0.08; P<.05) than in Groups 1 and 3 (0.45 +/- 0.21 and 0.41 +/- 0.17, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in patient satisfaction, contrast sensitivity, and UCDVA under glare conditions between the 3 groups (P>.05).
Aiming for emmetropia rather than myopia when calculating the power for the multifocal intraocular lens may improve visual acuity. However, patients must be considered on an individual basis to meet their expectations and requirements.
确定理想的目标屈光状态,以优化Array SA40N多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)(AMO)植入术后的视力(VA)和患者满意度。
韩国仁川仁荷大学医学院。
本研究前瞻性纳入了163例患者的188只眼,并根据术后屈光状态将其分为3组中的1组:第1组(43只近视眼,-0.50屈光度[D]至-1.50 D),第2组(114只正视眼,-0.50 D至+0.50 D)和第3组(31只远视眼,+0.50 D至+1.50 D)。然后比较3组之间的未矫正远视力(UCDVA)、未矫正近视力(UCNVA)、眩光条件下的UCDVA、对比敏感度和患者满意度。
术后3个月,所有眼的UCDVA、UCNVA、眩光条件下的UCDVA和对比敏感度均良好,超过72%的患者从不戴近用眼镜。与第1组和第3组(分别为0.40±0.24和0.38±0.30)相比,第2组的UCDVA明显更好(0.74±0.20;P<0.05);第2组的UCNVA(0.68±0.08;P<0.05)也明显优于第1组和第3组(分别为0.45±0.21和0.41±0.17)。然而,3组之间的患者满意度、对比敏感度和眩光条件下的UCDVA无显著差异(P>0.05)。
在计算多焦点人工晶状体的屈光度时,以正视而非近视作为目标可能会提高视力。然而,必须根据个体情况考虑患者,以满足他们的期望和需求。