• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Slow growth rates of Amazonian trees: consequences for carbon cycling.亚马逊树木的缓慢生长速度:对碳循环的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 20;102(51):18502-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505966102. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
2
Forest structure and carbon dynamics in Amazonian tropical rain forests.亚马逊热带雨林的森林结构与碳动态
Oecologia. 2004 Aug;140(3):468-79. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1598-z. Epub 2004 Jun 17.
3
Response of tree biomass and wood litter to disturbance in a Central Amazon forest.亚马孙中部森林中树木生物量和枯落物对干扰的响应
Oecologia. 2004 Dec;141(4):596-611. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1676-2. Epub 2004 Sep 7.
4
The linkages between photosynthesis, productivity, growth and biomass in lowland Amazonian forests.低地亚马逊森林的光合作用、生产力、生长和生物量之间的联系。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jun;21(6):2283-95. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12859. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
5
Windthrows control biomass patterns and functional composition of Amazon forests.风倒木控制着亚马逊森林的生物量格局和功能组成。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Dec;24(12):5867-5881. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14457. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
6
Increasing dominance of large lianas in Amazonian forests.大型藤本植物在亚马逊森林中的优势地位不断增强。
Nature. 2002 Aug 15;418(6899):770-4. doi: 10.1038/nature00926.
7
The impact of tree age on biomass growth and carbon accumulation capacity: A retrospective analysis using tree ring data of three tropical tree species grown in natural forests of Suriname.树龄对生物量增长和碳积累能力的影响:利用苏里南自然森林中生长的三种热带树种的年轮数据进行的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0181187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181187. eCollection 2017.
8
Forest biomass, productivity and carbon cycling along a rainfall gradient in West Africa.西非降水梯度上的森林生物量、生产力和碳循环。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Feb;24(2):e496-e510. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13907. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
9
Increasing biomass in Amazonian forest plots.增加亚马逊森林地块的生物量。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Mar 29;359(1443):353-65. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1422.
10
Drought-induced Amazonian wildfires instigate a decadal-scale disruption of forest carbon dynamics.干旱引发的亚马孙热带雨林野火促使森林碳动态出现了长达十年的破坏。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 8;373(1760):20180043. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0043.

引用本文的文献

1
Vertical canopy gradients of respiration drive plant carbon budgets and leaf area index.呼吸作用的垂直冠层梯度驱动着植物的碳收支和叶面积指数。
New Phytol. 2025 Apr;246(1):144-157. doi: 10.1111/nph.20423. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Maximum tree lifespans derived from public-domain dendrochronological data.源自公共领域树木年代学数据的树木最大寿命。
iScience. 2023 Feb 3;26(3):106138. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106138. eCollection 2023 Mar 17.
3
Recurrent droughts increase risk of cascading tipping events by outpacing adaptive capacities in the Amazon rainforest.反复发生的干旱使亚马逊雨林的适应能力相形见绌,增加了级联 tipping 事件发生的风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 9;119(32):e2120777119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120777119. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
Old and ancient trees are life history lottery winners and vital evolutionary resources for long-term adaptive capacity.古老的树木是生命历史上的幸运儿,也是长期适应能力的重要进化资源。
Nat Plants. 2022 Feb;8(2):136-145. doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01088-5. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Habitat Quality Differentiation and Consequences for Ecosystem Service Provision of an Amazonian Hyperdominant Tree Species.生境质量差异及其对亚马逊地区优势树种生态系统服务提供的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 31;12:621064. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.621064. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparative models disentangle drivers of fruit production variability of an economically and ecologically important long-lived Amazonian tree.比较模型解析了一种具有重要经济和生态意义的亚马逊长寿树果实产量变化的驱动因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2563. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81948-4.
7
Global tree-ring analysis reveals rapid decrease in tropical tree longevity with temperature.全球树木年轮分析显示,随着温度升高,热带树木的寿命迅速缩短。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 29;117(52):33358-33364. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003873117. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
8
Statistical age determination of tree rings.树木年轮的统计年龄测定。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 22;15(9):e0239052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239052. eCollection 2020.
9
Measures for sustainable forest management in the tropics - A tree-ring based case study on tree growth and forest dynamics in a Central Amazonian lowland moist forest.热带地区可持续森林管理措施 - 基于树木年轮的中央亚马逊低地湿润森林树木生长和森林动态的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 6;14(8):e0219770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219770. eCollection 2019.
10
Growth rings of Brazil nut trees (Bertholletia excelsa) as a living record of historical human disturbance in Central Amazonia.巴西坚果树的生长环作为中亚马逊地区历史人类干扰的活记录。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 3;14(4):e0214128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214128. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomass of tropical forests: a new estimate based on forest volumes.热带森林生物量:基于森林体积的新估计。
Science. 1984 Mar 23;223(4642):1290-3. doi: 10.1126/science.223.4642.1290.
2
Response of tree biomass and wood litter to disturbance in a Central Amazon forest.亚马孙中部森林中树木生物量和枯落物对干扰的响应
Oecologia. 2004 Dec;141(4):596-611. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1676-2. Epub 2004 Sep 7.
3
Forest structure and carbon dynamics in Amazonian tropical rain forests.亚马逊热带雨林的森林结构与碳动态
Oecologia. 2004 Aug;140(3):468-79. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1598-z. Epub 2004 Jun 17.
4
Dynamics of the forest communities at Pasoh and Barro Colorado: comparing two 50-ha plots.帕索和巴罗科罗拉多的森林群落动态:比较两个50公顷的样地。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Nov 29;354(1391):1739-48. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0517.
5
Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics.植被动态的长期研究。
Science. 2001 Jul 27;293(5530):650-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1062586.

亚马逊树木的缓慢生长速度:对碳循环的影响。

Slow growth rates of Amazonian trees: consequences for carbon cycling.

作者信息

Vieira Simone, Trumbore Susan, Camargo Plinio B, Selhorst Diogo, Chambers Jeffrey Q, Higuchi Niro, Martinelli Luiz Antonio

机构信息

Laboratório de Ecologia Isotópica, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, P.O. Box 96, CEP 13400-970, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 20;102(51):18502-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505966102. Epub 2005 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0505966102
PMID:16339903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1310511/
Abstract

Quantifying age structure and tree growth rate of Amazonian forests is essential for understanding their role in the carbon cycle. Here, we use radiocarbon dating and direct measurement of diameter increment to document unexpectedly slow growth rates for trees from three locations spanning the Brazilian Amazon basin. Central Amazon trees, averaging only approximately 1 mm/year diameter increment, grow half as fast as those from areas with more seasonal rainfall to the east and west. Slow growth rates mean that trees can attain great ages; across our sites we estimate 17-50% of trees with diameter >10 cm have ages exceeding 300 years. Whereas a few emergent trees that make up a large portion of the biomass grow faster, small trees that are more abundant grow slowly and attain ages of hundreds of years. The mean age of carbon in living trees (60-110 years) is within the range of or slightly longer than the mean residence time calculated from C inventory divided by annual C allocation to wood growth (40-100 years). Faster C turnover is observed in stands with overall higher rates of diameter increment and a larger fraction of the biomass in large, fast-growing trees. As a consequence, forests can recover biomass relatively quickly after disturbance, whereas recovering species composition may take many centuries. Carbon cycle models that apply a single turnover time for carbon in forest biomass do not account for variations in life strategy and therefore may overestimate the carbon sequestration potential of Amazon forests.

摘要

量化亚马逊森林的年龄结构和树木生长速率对于理解它们在碳循环中的作用至关重要。在这里,我们使用放射性碳测年法和直接测量直径增量,来记录巴西亚马逊河流域三个地点的树木出人意料的缓慢生长速率。亚马逊中部的树木平均直径增量仅约为每年1毫米,其生长速度仅为东西部季节性降雨较多地区树木的一半。生长速率缓慢意味着树木可以达到很高的年龄;在我们所有的研究地点,我们估计直径大于10厘米的树木中有17% - 50%的树龄超过300年。虽然构成大部分生物量的少数突出树木生长较快,但数量更多的小树生长缓慢,树龄可达数百年。活树中碳的平均年龄(60 - 110年)在根据碳储量除以每年分配给木材生长的碳量计算出的平均停留时间范围内(40 - 100年),或略长于此范围。在直径增量总体较高且生物量中较大比例为大型、快速生长树木的林分中,观察到碳周转更快。因此森林在受到干扰后可以相对较快地恢复生物量,而恢复物种组成可能需要几个世纪。在森林生物量中对碳应用单一周转时间的碳循环模型没有考虑到生命策略的变化,因此可能高估了亚马逊森林的碳固存潜力。