Mo Yirong, von Ragué Schleyer Paul
Department of Chemistry, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA.
Chemistry. 2006 Feb 20;12(7):2009-20. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500376.
Various criteria based on geometric, energetic, magnetic, and electronic properties are employed to delineate aromatic and antiaromatic systems. The recently proposed block-localized wave function (BLW) method evaluates the original Pauling-Wheland adiabatic resonance energy (ARE), defined as the energy difference between the real conjugated system and the corresponding virtual most stable resonance structure. The BLW-derived ARE of benzene is 57.5 kcal mol(-1) with the 6-311+G** basis set. Kistiakowsky's historical experimental evaluation of the stabilization energy of benzene (36 kcal mol(-1)), based on heats of hydrogenation, seriously underestimates this quantity due to the neglect of the partially counterbalancing hyperconjugative stabilization of cyclohexene, employed as the reference olefin (three times) in Kistiakowsky's evaluation. Based instead on the bond-separation-energy reaction involving ethene, which has no hyperconjugation, as well as methane and ethane, the experimental resonance energy of benzene is found to be 65.0 kcal mol(-1). We derived the "extra cyclic resonance energy" (ECRE) to characterize and measure the extra stabilization (aromaticity) of conjugated rings. ECRE is the difference between the AREs of a fully cyclically conjugated compound and an appropriate model with corresponding, but interrupted (acyclic) conjugation. Based on 1,3,5-hexatriene, which also has three double bonds, the ECRE of benzene is 36.7 kcal mol(-1), whereas based on 1,3,5,7-octatetraene, which has three diene conjugations, the ECRE of benzene is 25.7 kcal mol(-1). Computations on a series of aromatic, nonaromatic, and antiaromatic five-membered rings validate the BLW-computed resonance energies (ARE). ECRE data on the five-membered rings (derived from comparisons with acyclic models) correlate well with nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) and other quantitative aromaticity criteria. The ARE of cyclobutadiene is almost the same as butadiene but is 10.5 kcal mol(-1) less than 1,3,5-hexatriene, which also has two diene conjugations. The instability and high reactivity of cyclobutadiene thus mainly result from the sigma-frame strain and the pi-pi Pauli repulsion.
基于几何、能量、磁性和电子性质的各种标准被用于界定芳香体系和反芳香体系。最近提出的块定域波函数(BLW)方法评估了原始的鲍林-惠兰绝热共振能(ARE),其定义为真实共轭体系与相应的虚拟最稳定共振结构之间的能量差。在6-311+G**基组下,由BLW方法得出的苯的ARE为57.5千卡/摩尔。基斯佳科夫斯基基于氢化热对苯的稳定能进行的历史实验评估(36千卡/摩尔),由于在基斯佳科夫斯基的评估中用作参考烯烃(三次)的环己烯的部分超共轭稳定作用被忽略,严重低估了这个数值。相反,基于涉及乙烯(没有超共轭)以及甲烷和乙烷的键分离能反应,苯的实验共振能为65.0千卡/摩尔。我们推导了“环外共振能”(ECRE)来表征和测量共轭环的额外稳定性(芳香性)。ECRE是完全环共轭化合物与具有相应但中断(非环)共轭的合适模型的ARE之间的差值。基于同样具有三个双键的1,3,5-己三烯,苯的ECRE为36.7千卡/摩尔,而基于具有三个二烯共轭的1,3,5,7-辛四烯,苯的ECRE为25.7千卡/摩尔。对一系列芳香、非芳香和反芳香五元环的计算验证了BLW计算的共振能(ARE)。五元环的ECRE数据(通过与非环模型比较得出)与核独立化学位移(NICS)和其他定量芳香性标准有很好的相关性。环丁二烯的ARE与丁二烯几乎相同,但比同样具有两个二烯共轭的1,3,5-己三烯少10.5千卡/摩尔。因此,环丁二烯的不稳定性和高反应活性主要源于σ-骨架应变和π-π泡利排斥。