Waage H, Silsand T, Urdal P, Langård S
Department of Occupational Medicine, Telemark Central Hospital, Porsgrunn, Norway.
Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Jun;21(3):488-93. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.3.488.
To develop a procedure for maximizing the discrimination of smoking status, the authors analysed parallel samples of thiocyanate and cotinine in serum, and carbon monoxide (CO) in expired air in a cohort of 145 male subjects aged 45-65 years. The sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 82%, 97% and 83%, and 98% and 100% for thiocyanate, cotinine, and CO respectively. The results were not significantly improved when combining two or three methods as compared with CO separately. Also, cotinine in urine was analysed in a subgroup of 21 subjects. The correlation coefficient between cotinine in serum and urine was 0.92. In a subgroup of 44 subjects with extensive information on smoking habits, CO was the only indicator significantly related to the quantity of tobacco smoked. We conclude that CO seems sufficient for validating smoking status, but as atypical smokers who are vulnerable to misclassification may be overrepresented in smoking cessation programmes, combining two methods could still be useful. Validating the amount of tobacco smoked is of limited use with the current methods.
为制定一种能最大程度区分吸烟状况的方法,作者分析了145名年龄在45至65岁之间男性受试者队列中血清硫氰酸盐和可替宁的平行样本以及呼出气体中的一氧化碳(CO)。硫氰酸盐、可替宁和CO的敏感性和特异性分别为93%和82%、97%和83%、98%和100%。与单独使用CO相比,联合使用两种或三种方法时结果并未显著改善。此外,还对21名受试者的亚组进行了尿中可替宁分析。血清和尿中可替宁的相关系数为0.92。在一个有大量吸烟习惯信息的44名受试者亚组中,CO是唯一与吸烟量显著相关的指标。我们得出结论,CO似乎足以验证吸烟状况,但由于在戒烟项目中可能非典型吸烟者(易被误分类)的比例过高,联合使用两种方法可能仍有用。用当前方法验证吸烟量的作用有限。