Rickert W S, Robinson J C
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1981 Mar-Apr;7(3-4):391-403. doi: 10.1080/15287398109529990.
Yields of chemical constituents such as tar, nicotine, CO, and HCN defined by smoking machines are commonly assumed to provide a reasonable indication of the relative hazard associated with smoking a given brand of cigarette. Results reported here suggest that this assumption should be carefully reexamined. A total of 240 subjects, representing a wide range of smoking and brand characteristics, were recruited for an investigation of possible relations between brand yields and exposure (levels of carboxyhemoglobin, breath CO, plasma cotinine, plasma thiocyanate, and saliva thiocyanate). Exposure was highly correlated with consumption (number of cigarettes per day), but their was no correlation between any estimate of exposure and brand yield when level of consumption was held constant. In addition, a comparison of levels of carboxyhemoglobin and plasma thiocyanate for 16 smokers of "low-hazard" and 15 smokers of "high-hazard" cigarette brands revealed little difference between the two groups, even though average cigarette yields differed as much as 2- to 3-fold. A possible explanation for the results may be that current values for average puff volume, duration, and interval differ significantly from those used in programming smoking machines, particularly in the case of brands with low nicotine delivery.
通常认为,由吸烟机测定的焦油、尼古丁、一氧化碳和氢氰酸等化学成分的含量能合理地反映吸某一特定品牌香烟的相对危害程度。本文报告的结果表明,这一假设应予以仔细重新审视。我们招募了240名代表广泛吸烟和品牌特征的受试者,以调查品牌含量与接触程度(碳氧血红蛋白水平、呼出一氧化碳、血浆可替宁、血浆硫氰酸盐和唾液硫氰酸盐)之间的可能关系。接触程度与吸烟量(每天吸烟支数)高度相关,但在吸烟量保持不变时,任何接触程度的估计值与品牌含量之间均无相关性。此外,对16名吸“低危害”香烟品牌者和15名吸“高危害”香烟品牌者的碳氧血红蛋白和血浆硫氰酸盐水平进行比较,结果显示,尽管平均香烟含量相差达2至3倍,但两组之间几乎没有差异。这些结果的一个可能解释是,目前平均吸量、持续时间和间隔时间的值与用于设置吸烟机的值有显著差异,尤其是对于尼古丁释放量低的品牌。