Chiu Ming-Jang, Liu Kristina, Hsieh Ming H, Hwu Hai-Gwo
Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Behav Brain Funct. 2005 Dec 12;1:23. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-1-23.
Implicit learning was reported to be intact in schizophrenia using artificial grammar learning. However, emerging evidence indicates that artificial grammar learning is not a unitary process. The authors used dual coding stimuli and schizophrenia clinical symptom dimensions to re-evaluate the effect of schizophrenia on various components of artificial grammar learning.
Letter string and color pattern artificial grammar learning performances were compared between 63 schizophrenic patients and 27 comparison subjects. Four symptom dimensions derived from a Chinese Positive and Negative Symptom Scale ratings were correlated with patients' artificial grammar implicit learning performances along the two stimulus dimensions. Patients' explicit memory performances were assessed by verbal paired associates and visual reproduction subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scales Revised Version to provide a contrast to their implicit memory function.
Schizophrenia severely hindered color pattern artificial grammar learning while the disease affected lexical string artificial grammar learning to a lesser degree after correcting the influences from age, education and the performance of explicit memory function of both verbal and visual modalities. Both learning performances correlated significantly with the severity of patients' schizophrenic clinical symptom dimensions that reflect poor abstract thinking, disorganized thinking, and stereotyped thinking.
The results of this study suggested that schizophrenia affects various mechanisms of artificial grammar learning differently. Implicit learning, knowledge acquisition in the absence of conscious awareness, is not entirely intact in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia affects implicit learning through an impairment of the ability of making abstractions from rules and at least in part decreasing the capacity for perceptual learning.
据报道,使用人工语法学习时,精神分裂症患者的内隐学习是完整的。然而,新出现的证据表明,人工语法学习并非一个单一的过程。作者使用双重编码刺激和精神分裂症临床症状维度来重新评估精神分裂症对人工语法学习各个组成部分的影响。
比较了63名精神分裂症患者和27名对照受试者在字母串和颜色模式人工语法学习方面的表现。从中国阳性和阴性症状量表评分中得出的四个症状维度,与患者在这两种刺激维度上的人工语法内隐学习表现相关。通过韦氏记忆量表修订版的言语配对联想和视觉再现子测试来评估患者的外显记忆表现,以与其内隐记忆功能形成对比。
在纠正了年龄、教育程度以及言语和视觉两种模式的外显记忆功能表现的影响后,精神分裂症严重阻碍了颜色模式人工语法学习,而对词汇串人工语法学习的影响较小。两种学习表现均与反映抽象思维差、思维紊乱和刻板思维的精神分裂症患者临床症状维度的严重程度显著相关。
本研究结果表明,精神分裂症对人工语法学习的各种机制影响不同。内隐学习,即在没有意识觉知的情况下获取知识,在精神分裂症患者中并不完全完整。精神分裂症通过损害从规则中进行抽象的能力,以及至少部分降低感知学习能力来影响内隐学习。