Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal Research and Department of Biology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1366-72. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.6.1366-1372.1982.
The spatial and temporal distributions of marine bacteria were studied at both a muddy and a sandy subtidal site in North Inlet, S.C. The sampling design was hierarchical, since subsampling (by a dilution series) of the sediments was necessary to count bacterial cells using acridine orange epifluoresence microscopy. The cell count data fit a log-normal distribution. The abundance of bacteria was 10 g (dry weight) of mud and 10 g (dry weight) of sand. Variance component analyses demonstrated that variation due to the subsampling procedures was always statistically significant. Thus the common practice of counting 20 fields from one filter preparation is inadequate for estimating the true bacterial population variance in marine sediments. It is recommended that replication of the subsampling level be performed. Standardization of data (by dry weight of sediment) decreased sampling variance at the mud site but not at the sand site, implying that bacteria are more homogeneously distributed in sand than in mud.
本研究对南卡罗来纳州北 inlet 潮下带泥滩和沙滩两处底栖生境中的海洋细菌的时空分布进行了研究。由于需采用吖啶橙荧光显微镜对沉积物进行逐级稀释以对细菌细胞进行计数,采样设计采用了分层方法。细胞计数数据符合对数正态分布。细菌丰度为每克泥(干重)和每克沙(干重)中分别有 10 个细胞。方差分量分析表明,由于逐级稀释过程造成的变异总是具有统计学意义。因此,从一个滤膜制备物中计数 20 个视野的常规做法不足以估计海洋沉积物中真正的细菌种群变异。建议对逐级稀释水平进行重复取样。数据(以沉积物干重标准化)降低了泥滩采样的方差,但对沙滩没有影响,这意味着与泥滩相比,细菌在沙滩中分布更加均匀。