Suppr超能文献

两种用于水生细菌计数的直接计数技术的比较。

Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteria.

作者信息

Bowden W B

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1229-32. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1229-1232.1977.

Abstract

Planktonic bacteria from an estuary were concentrated on membrane filters and counted with both a scanning electron microscope and an epi-illuminated fluorescent microscope. Counts on 0.2 micron Nuclepore filters (polycarbonate) were significantly higher (P less than 0.001) than counts on 0.2-micron Sartorius filters (cellulose). In contrast, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques when Nuclepore filters were used (0.5 less than P less than 0.9). The average cell volume from this study area was 0.047 micron3. The estimated number of bacteria ranged from 10(6) to 10(7) bacteria per ml, representing from 4 to 40 mg of C per m3.

摘要

河口的浮游细菌被浓缩在膜滤器上,并用扫描电子显微镜和落射荧光显微镜进行计数。在0.2微米的核孔滤膜(聚碳酸酯)上的计数显著高于(P小于0.001)在0.2微米的赛多利斯滤膜(纤维素)上的计数。相比之下,当使用核孔滤膜时,两种技术之间没有统计学上的显著差异(0.5小于P小于0.9)。该研究区域的细菌平均细胞体积为0.047立方微米。估计每毫升细菌数量在10⁶至10⁷个之间,相当于每立方米4至40毫克碳。

相似文献

5
6
Sand beach bacteria: enumeration and characterization.沙滩细菌:计数与特性分析
Appl Microbiol. 1973 Sep;26(3):293-7. doi: 10.1128/am.26.3.293-297.1973.

引用本文的文献

10
Bacterial biovolume and biomass estimations.细菌生物体积和生物量估计。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jun;49(6):1488-93. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.6.1488-1493.1985.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验