Dienemann J, Shaffer C
School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.
J Prof Nurs. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):148-54. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90024-s.
This study investigated the consensus among schools of nursing in (1) using the eight elements of effective performance appraisal identified in the literature and (2) identification of domains, dimensions, and subdimensions of faculty performance. Content analysis was done of actual policies, procedures, and forms from 86 schools with graduate programs. Performance appraisal systems were found to be in an early stage of development. There was substantive agreement on teaching, service, and research as domains, with 25% or fewer schools also using faculty development, professional practice, and/or administration. There was less consensus as to the attributes of domains. Specific dimensions and their assignment to domains, as well as recommendations to guide future development, are discussed.
(1)运用文献中确定的有效绩效评估的八个要素;(2)确定教师绩效的领域、维度和子维度。对86所设有研究生项目的学校的实际政策、程序和表格进行了内容分析。发现绩效评估系统正处于发展的早期阶段。在教学、服务和研究作为领域方面存在实质性共识,只有25%或更少的学校还使用教师发展、专业实践和/或管理。在领域的属性方面共识较少。讨论了具体维度及其在各领域的分配,以及指导未来发展的建议。