Suppr超能文献

教师绩效评估系统:程序与标准

Faculty performance appraisal systems: procedures and criteria.

作者信息

Dienemann J, Shaffer C

机构信息

School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205.

出版信息

J Prof Nurs. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):148-54. doi: 10.1016/8755-7223(92)90024-s.

Abstract

This study investigated the consensus among schools of nursing in (1) using the eight elements of effective performance appraisal identified in the literature and (2) identification of domains, dimensions, and subdimensions of faculty performance. Content analysis was done of actual policies, procedures, and forms from 86 schools with graduate programs. Performance appraisal systems were found to be in an early stage of development. There was substantive agreement on teaching, service, and research as domains, with 25% or fewer schools also using faculty development, professional practice, and/or administration. There was less consensus as to the attributes of domains. Specific dimensions and their assignment to domains, as well as recommendations to guide future development, are discussed.

摘要

本研究调查了护理学院在以下方面的共识

(1)运用文献中确定的有效绩效评估的八个要素;(2)确定教师绩效的领域、维度和子维度。对86所设有研究生项目的学校的实际政策、程序和表格进行了内容分析。发现绩效评估系统正处于发展的早期阶段。在教学、服务和研究作为领域方面存在实质性共识,只有25%或更少的学校还使用教师发展、专业实践和/或管理。在领域的属性方面共识较少。讨论了具体维度及其在各领域的分配,以及指导未来发展的建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验