Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jan;53(1):119-28. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.1.119-128.1987.
Application of eucaryote inhibitors to the estimation of production and grazing mortality of bacterioplankton was evaluated. Exposure to a range of concentrations of thiram, cycloheximide, and neutral red (0.4 to 210, 36 to 1,777, 4 to 346 muM, respectively) was 98 to 100% effective at inhibiting growth of a chrysomonad in culture. Exposure to colchicine and griseofulvin (50 to 1,000 muM for both) yielded only 24 to 94 and 53 to 79% inhibition, respectively. Exposures to thiram, neutral red, and griseofulvin were 90 to 100% effective at inhibiting growth in culture of a ciliate, Cyclidium sp., and the responses to colchicine and cycloheximide were variable (64 to 100 and 0 to 100% inhibition, respectively). Thiram and neutral red inhibited field populations of nanozooplankton more effectively than cycloheximide and colchicine. Direct effects of eucaryote inhibitors on growing cultures of bacterioplankton varied with parameters measured and duration of exposure. After 3-day exposures, specific growth rates and "instantaneous" heterotrophic potential ([C]glucose uptake) were not consistently affected, but biosynthetic activity (RNA and DNA syntheses) was depressed. The degree of inhibition of isolates and field populations of phytoplankton depended upon type of inhibitor and phytoplankton species. In field experiments, it was possible to calculate rates of bacterioplankton production and grazing mortality for only 16 of 29 inhibitor experiments and for 4 of 10 size fractionation experiments. Bacterioplankton production and mortality estimates varied greatly with the eucaryote inhibitor used, and those derived from inhibition techniques were substantially different from those derived from fractionation techniques. The poor performances of both techniques are attributed to the following: (i) effects of inhibitors on phytoplankton, (ii) indirect effects of the inhibitors on bacterioplankton, and (iii) insufficient separation of grazers from prey by filtration techniques. Because of the inconsistent results obtained in this investigation, we strongly recommend exercising caution in the application of inhibitor techniques to ecological problems, especially in phototrophically dominated systems.
评估了真核生物抑制剂在估算细菌浮游生物的生产力和牧食死亡率中的应用。三唑磷、环己酰亚胺和中性红(分别为 0.4 至 210、36 至 1777 和 4 至 346 μM)的一系列浓度暴露对培养的脆杆藻生长的抑制率为 98%至 100%。秋水仙素和灰黄霉素(两者浓度为 50 至 1000 μM)的暴露仅分别产生 24%至 94%和 53%至 79%的抑制率。三唑磷、中性红和灰黄霉素对培养的纤毛虫 Cyclidium sp. 的生长抑制率为 90%至 100%,而秋水仙素和环己酰亚胺的反应则各不相同(64%至 100%和 0%至 100%的抑制率)。三唑磷和中性红对现场纳米浮游动物种群的抑制作用比环己酰亚胺和秋水仙素更有效。真核生物抑制剂对细菌浮游生物生长培养物的直接影响因所测参数和暴露时间而异。在 3 天的暴露后,特定生长率和“瞬时”异养潜能([C]葡萄糖摄取)并未一致受到影响,但生物合成活性(RNA 和 DNA 合成)受到抑制。浮游植物分离株和现场种群的抑制程度取决于抑制剂的类型和浮游植物的种类。在现场实验中,仅在 29 个抑制剂实验中的 16 个和 10 个大小分级实验中的 4 个实验中可以计算细菌浮游生物的生产力和牧食死亡率。细菌浮游生物的生产力和死亡率估计值因所使用的真核生物抑制剂而有很大差异,且这些估计值与分级技术所得的值有很大不同。这两种技术的表现都很差,原因如下:(i)抑制剂对浮游植物的影响,(ii)抑制剂对细菌浮游生物的间接影响,以及(iii)过滤技术对摄食者和猎物的分离不充分。由于本研究中得到的结果不一致,我们强烈建议在应用抑制剂技术解决生态问题时要谨慎,特别是在以光养生物为主导的系统中。