Suppr超能文献

三种耳鸣自我评估量表的效度和信度研究:响度、烦恼程度及变化情况

Validity and reliability study of three tinnitus self-assessment scales: loudness, annoyance and change.

作者信息

Zenner H Peter, De Maddalena Harry

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 Nov;125(11):1184-8. doi: 10.1080/00016480510012282.

Abstract

CONCLUSIONS

The three tinnitus self-rating scales described herein can be employed as part of "minimal datasets" to reflect the patient's current tinnitus status. These tests are simple and easy to use and can be completed by the patient alone. The results are easy to interpret and provide a good foundation for an effective doctor-patient dialogue.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the reliability and validity of three tinnitus self-rating scales: a six-point response scale for tinnitus loudness; an eight-point response scale for tinnitus annoyance; and a six-point response scale for tinnitus change.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The data for 273 patients participating in 2 separate studies were assessed in terms of their validity and reliability. We used criterion validity to determine whether the scales had empirical associations with external criteria, in this case an already firmly established tinnitus questionnaire. In addition we examined construct validity, i.e. its subcategories convergent and discriminant validity, in order to find out how related or unrelated items or scales were. We tested the reliability and repeatability of the scales using patients on our waiting list for tinnitus desensitization.

RESULTS

The test-retest reliability was 0.72 for tinnitus loudness and 0.62 for tinnitus annoyance. Calculations showed that all three scales correlated positively with validated complex scales and thus we considered convergent validity to be adequate.

摘要

结论

本文所述的三种耳鸣自评量表可作为“最小数据集”的一部分,以反映患者当前的耳鸣状况。这些测试简单易用,患者可独自完成。结果易于解读,为有效的医患对话奠定了良好基础。

目的

研究三种耳鸣自评量表的信度和效度:耳鸣响度六点反应量表;耳鸣烦恼八点反应量表;耳鸣变化六点反应量表。

材料与方法

对参与两项独立研究的273例患者的数据进行效度和信度评估。我们使用效标效度来确定量表是否与外部标准存在实证关联,在本研究中,外部标准为一个已被广泛认可的耳鸣问卷。此外,我们还检验了结构效度,即其子类别收敛效度和区分效度,以了解各项目或量表之间的相关程度或无关程度。我们使用等待耳鸣脱敏治疗的患者来测试量表的信度和可重复性。

结果

耳鸣响度的重测信度为0.72,耳鸣烦恼的重测信度为0.62。计算结果表明,所有三种量表均与经过验证的综合量表呈正相关,因此我们认为收敛效度是足够的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验