• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前焦虑的临床评估:焦虑肽(地西泮结合抑制剂)血浆水平的变化

[Clinical evaluation of pre-surgical anxiety: changes in plasma levels of the anxiety peptide (diazepam binding inhibitor)].

作者信息

Launo C, De Grandi R, Augeri C, Palermo S, Riello R, Germi M R, Focacci V, Spirandelli P, Riverso P

机构信息

Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Genova.

出版信息

Minerva Anestesiol. 1992 May;58(5):245-51.

PMID:1635633
Abstract

The score scale of anxiety (STAI, Y, 1-2) and haematic levels of DBI (diazepam binding inhibitor) were used in 48 surgical patients for clinical evaluation of preoperative anxiety, before and after drugs for preoperative medication. After randomization, were clinically and statistically compared 6 groups according to premedicant drugs (diazepam 0.3 mg/kg; flunitrazepam 0.03 mg/kg; saline; prometazine 0.7 mg/kg); before and after preoperative medication were evaluated the anxiety relief with the score scale, haematic levels of DBI and haemodynamics (systolic and diastolic AP and HR). The results show that DBI can objectively measure the anxiety relief, that not are correlate haematic levels of DBI and score scale, that the best benzodiazepines are diazepam (0.3) and flunitrazepam (0.015) and that the prometazine might give anxiety relief for 5-HT antagonist action. Even if there are limits to study (scanty cases, are missing the range and the brain values of DBI and blood test of DBI is slow method) may be useful the use of score scale and haematic levels of DBI in clinical evaluation of preoperative anxiety relief.

摘要

对48例外科手术患者使用焦虑评分量表(状态-特质焦虑问卷,Y型,1-2)和DBI(地西泮结合抑制剂)的血液水平,来对术前用药前后的术前焦虑进行临床评估。随机分组后,根据术前用药(地西泮0.3mg/kg;氟硝西泮0.03mg/kg;生理盐水;异丙嗪0.7mg/kg)将6组进行临床和统计学比较;在术前用药前后,使用评分量表、DBI血液水平和血流动力学(收缩压和舒张压以及心率)评估焦虑缓解情况。结果显示,DBI能够客观地测量焦虑缓解情况,DBI血液水平与评分量表不相关,最佳的苯二氮䓬类药物是地西泮(0.3)和氟硝西泮(0.015),并且异丙嗪可能因其5-羟色胺拮抗剂作用而缓解焦虑。即使本研究存在局限性(病例较少,缺少DBI的范围和脑值,且DBI血液检测方法较慢),但在术前焦虑缓解的临床评估中使用评分量表和DBI血液水平可能会有帮助。

相似文献

1
[Clinical evaluation of pre-surgical anxiety: changes in plasma levels of the anxiety peptide (diazepam binding inhibitor)].术前焦虑的临床评估:焦虑肽(地西泮结合抑制剂)血浆水平的变化
Minerva Anestesiol. 1992 May;58(5):245-51.
2
[Comparison of the effectiveness of orally administered clorazepate dipotassium and nordiazepam on preoperative anxiety].口服双钾氯氮卓和去甲西泮对术前焦虑的疗效比较
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 1995;20(6):144-8.
3
A comparative study of the clinical effects of pentobarbital and diazepam given orally as preoperative medication.戊巴比妥和地西泮口服作为术前用药的临床效果比较研究。
J Oral Surg. 1980 Mar;38(3):188-90.
4
[Comparison of the effects of flunitrazepam and diazepam used in premedication].[氟硝西泮和地西泮用于术前用药的效果比较]
Cah Anesthesiol. 1984 Dec;32(8 Suppl):7-9.
5
[Stress reduction by i.m. premedication with 6 different single substances].
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed. 1984 Feb;19(1):1-7.
6
[Effects of diazepam and flunitrazepam on the undesired postoperative side-effects of ketamine anaesthesia (author's transl)].地西泮和氟硝西泮对氯胺酮麻醉术后不良副作用的影响(作者译)
Anaesthesist. 1978 Jun;27(6):302-8.
7
Preanesthetic medication in elective surgery: comparison of intravenous diazepam with meperidine.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 1973 Jul;15(7):441-8.
8
Temazepam versus flunitrazepam as an oral premedication in adult surgical patients.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1987 Nov;4(6):435-40.
9
[Changes in psychological features in patients for anesthesia and operation during perioperative period].[围手术期麻醉与手术患者心理特征的变化]
Masui. 1998 Sep;47(9):1085-9.
10
Association of a Met88Val diazepam binding inhibitor (DBI) gene polymorphism and anxiety disorders with panic attacks.88位甲硫氨酸至缬氨酸(Met88Val)地西泮结合抑制剂(DBI)基因多态性与焦虑症伴惊恐发作的关联。
J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Oct;41(7):579-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Aug 14.