Hamran Olav
Nasjonalt medisinsk museum, Norsk Teknisk Museum, Kjelsåsveien 143, 0491 Oslo.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Dec 15;125(24):3482-5.
The alcohol issue had a prominent place in Norwegian politics and society in the first decades of the 20th century; teetotalers' organisations had a major role. Prohibition was the ultimate way of solving the alcohol problem. After the prohibition (1916-27), the teetotalers lost their hegemony. Anti-prohibition views became influential in the making of Norwegian alcohol policy. The post-prohibition years have been seen as at period of change in which a moralist and condemning attitude to alcohol and alcoholics were replaced by a more humane disease concept of alcoholism. This article challenges this view. After prohibition, to separate between use and abuse of alcohol was the main focus of Norwegian alcohol policy. Alcohol abuse and alcohol abusers became the main targets. Abuse of alcohol was first and foremost seen as a social category, as immoral behaviour. In the 1930s, a moralist and condemning attitude toward excessive drinking and drinkers was put forward, not replaced, in Norwegian alcohol policy. A concept of alcoholism as a disease had little or no impact in these years.
在20世纪的头几十年里,酒精问题在挪威政治和社会中占据显著地位;禁酒主义者组织发挥了重要作用。禁酒是解决酒精问题的最终方式。禁酒令实施后(1916 - 1927年),禁酒主义者失去了主导地位。反禁酒观点在挪威酒精政策的制定中变得具有影响力。禁酒令后的岁月被视为一个变革时期,在这个时期,对酒精和酗酒者的道德主义和谴责态度被一种更人道的酗酒疾病观念所取代。本文对这一观点提出质疑。禁酒令之后,区分酒精的使用和滥用成为挪威酒精政策的主要焦点。酒精滥用和酗酒者成为主要目标。酒精滥用首先被视为一种社会范畴,是不道德的行为。在20世纪30年代,挪威的酒精政策提出了对过度饮酒和饮酒者的道德主义和谴责态度,而非将其取代。在这些年里,酗酒是一种疾病的观念几乎没有产生影响。