Kulak Yasemin, Ozcan Mutlu, Arikan Ayla
Department of Prosthodontics, University of Marmara, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Prosthodont. 2005 Dec;14(4):248-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00049.x.
This study evaluated the subjective responses of 30 denture wearers with regard to the effectiveness of two denture adhesive pastes.
Thirty patients responded to questions related to retention, chewing ability, taste, duration of adhesives in the mouth, and removal; comparing the use of two denture adhesives based on polymethylvinylether-maleic anhydride compounds or carboxymethyl cellulose.
The denture adhesive paste based on polymethylvinylether-maleic anhydride (PVM-MA) compound was rated higher (73% and 87%) than carboxymethyl cellulose (CC) adhesive paste (60% and 37%) on chewing ability and duration in the mouth (p= 0.0001 and p= 0.0001, respectively) by experienced denture wearers in both maxilla and mandible. There were no statistically significant differences between the two denture adhesive pastes on the retention of maxillary dentures, taste, and removal of the adhesive (p= 0.08, p= 0.67, and p= 0.41, respectively).
All subjects responded that the retention of their dentures was either a little better or much better when using either of the adhesive pastes.
本研究评估了30名义齿佩戴者对两种义齿黏附剂效果的主观反应。
30名患者回答了有关固位、咀嚼能力、味道、黏附剂在口腔中的持续时间以及去除方面的问题;比较了基于聚甲基乙烯基醚-马来酸酐化合物或羧甲基纤维素的两种义齿黏附剂的使用情况。
在上颌和下颌中,经验丰富的义齿佩戴者对基于聚甲基乙烯基醚-马来酸酐(PVM-MA)化合物的义齿黏附剂在咀嚼能力和在口腔中的持续时间方面的评分(分别为73%和87%)高于羧甲基纤维素(CC)黏附剂(分别为60%和37%)(p分别为0.0001和0.0001)。两种义齿黏附剂在上颌义齿的固位、味道和黏附剂的去除方面无统计学显著差异(p分别为0.08、0.67和0.41)。
所有受试者均表示,使用任何一种黏附剂时,其义齿的固位情况均略有改善或明显改善。