• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两种义齿黏附剂对全口义齿患者疗效的临床研究。

Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients.

作者信息

Pradíes Guillermo, Sanz Ignacio, Evans Ofelia, Martnez Francisco, Sanz Mariano

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):361-7.

PMID:19639073
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two denture adhesives in edentulous patients wearing complete maxillary and mandibular dentures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four edentulous patients were treated with complete dentures following a standardized protocol. Resistance to dislodgement of both dentures was measured in simulated functional movements by means of a gnathometer and a dynamometer. These outcome measurements were assessed first without the adhesive and then after two successive 2-week periods of using a randomly assigned denture adhesive in a crossover experimental design. The adhesives used were a standard one (Kukident Classic) and a new adhesive with a similar formulation but different physical characteristics (Kukident Pro).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (mean age: 58 years) participated in this study. Gnathometer results demonstrated significant differences between the nonadhesive group and both the experimental adhesive (P = .008) and the control adhesive groups (P = .021). Differences between both adhesive groups were not significant (P = .161). Dynamometer results showed highly significant differences between the maxillary and mandibular dentures in both the nonadhesive group and the two adhesive groups (P =or< .0001). Similarly, highly significant differences were found when any of the adhesive groups were compared with the nonadhesive group (P = .0001). The patient subjective evaluation was very favorable for both adhesives.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the predicted and expected improvement in the stability and retention of well-fitting complete dentures with the adjunctive use of adhesives. The observed and recorded improvements with the new adhesive as compared to the traditional one were not statistically significant.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种义齿黏附剂对佩戴全口上下颌义齿的无牙颌患者的疗效。

材料与方法

24名无牙颌患者按照标准化方案佩戴全口义齿。通过测颌仪和测力计在模拟功能运动中测量两种义齿的抗脱位性。这些结果测量首先在不使用黏附剂的情况下进行,然后在交叉实验设计中,在连续两个为期2周的时间段内使用随机分配的义齿黏附剂后进行评估。使用的黏附剂一种是标准型(Kukident Classic),另一种是配方相似但物理特性不同的新型黏附剂(Kukident Pro)。

结果

24名患者(平均年龄:58岁)参与了本研究。测颌仪结果显示,未使用黏附剂组与实验黏附剂组(P = .008)和对照黏附剂组(P = .021)之间存在显著差异。两种黏附剂组之间的差异不显著(P = .161)。测力计结果显示,未使用黏附剂组以及两个黏附剂组的上颌和下颌义齿之间存在高度显著差异(P =或< .0001)。同样,当将任何一个黏附剂组与未使用黏附剂组进行比较时,发现存在高度显著差异(P = .0001)。患者对两种黏附剂的主观评价都非常好。

结论

本研究证实了辅助使用黏附剂能使合适的全口义齿的稳定性和固位力得到预期和期望的改善。与传统黏附剂相比,新型黏附剂观察到和记录到的改善在统计学上并不显著。

相似文献

1
Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients.比较两种义齿黏附剂对全口义齿患者疗效的临床研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):361-7.
2
An international multicenter study on the effectiveness of a denture adhesive in maxillary dentures using disposable gnathometers.一项使用一次性颌骨测量仪对上颌义齿中义齿黏合剂有效性进行的国际多中心研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Sep;11(3):237-43. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0109-0. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
3
Adhesive-mediated enhancement of occlusal force measurements in patients with existing and new complete dentures: a pilot study.黏附力增强对现有和新全口义齿患者咬合力量测量的影响:一项初步研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):155-7.
4
Subjective assessment by patients of the efficiency of two denture adhesive pastes.患者对两种义齿黏附膏效果的主观评估。
J Prosthodont. 2005 Dec;14(4):248-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00049.x.
5
The effect of a new denture adhesive on bite force until denture dislodgement.一种新型义齿粘合剂对义齿脱位前咬合力的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2005 Jun;14(2):122-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00020.x.
6
Effect of adaptation time on the occlusal force at denture dislodgement with or without denture adhesive.适应时间对有无义齿胶的义齿脱位时的咬合力量的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Mar;111(3):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
7
The effect of denture design and fixatives on the retention of mandibular complete dentures tested on a novel in-vitro edentulous model.在一种新型体外无牙颌模型上测试义齿设计和固定剂对下颌全口义齿固位的影响。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2013 Jun;21(2):64-74.
8
A clinical study to evaluate denture adhesive use in well-fitting dentures.一项评估全口义齿中使用义齿黏附剂的临床研究。
J Prosthodont. 2012 Feb;21(2):123-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00795.x. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
9
Masticatory performance of complete denture wearers after using two adhesives: a crossover randomized clinical trial.使用两种黏附剂后全口义齿佩戴者的咀嚼性能:一项交叉随机临床试验
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
A randomised bite force study assessing two currently marketed denture adhesive products compared with no-adhesive control.一项随机咬合力研究,评估两种目前市场上销售的义齿粘合剂产品,并与无粘合剂对照组进行比较。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 May 14;5(3):276-283. doi: 10.1002/cre2.182. eCollection 2019 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The potential effect of ethyl alcohol elution from liner type denture adhesives on breath alcohol concentration and determination of drunk driving.衬垫型义齿粘合剂中乙醇洗脱对呼气酒精浓度及酒后驾车判定的潜在影响
J Dent Sci. 2023 Jul;18(3):985-990. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.12.007. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
2
Biocompatibility and Effectiveness of a Novel, Organic Olive Oil-Based Denture Adhesive: A Multicenter Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.新型有机橄榄油义齿黏附剂的生物相容性和有效性:一项多中心随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073398.
3
Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single- and mixed-species.
全口义齿黏附剂对单种和混合种微生物黏附及生物膜形成的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0203951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203951. eCollection 2018.
4
Satisfaction in complete denture wearers with and without adhesives: A randomized, crossover, double-blind clinical trial.使用和不使用粘合剂的全口义齿佩戴者的满意度:一项随机、交叉、双盲临床试验。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Jun 1;10(6):e585-e590. doi: 10.4317/jced.54871. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Study protocol for a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to develop Japanese denture adhesive guidelines for patients with complete dentures: the Denture Adhesive Guideline trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在为全口义齿患者制定日本义齿粘合剂指南:义齿粘合剂指南试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Oct 18;17(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1612-x.
6
Efficacy of denture adhesives in maxillary dentures using gnathodynamometry: a comparative study.使用咀嚼测力法评估上颌义齿中义齿黏附剂的疗效:一项对比研究。
Odontology. 2011 Jul;99(2):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0003-8. Epub 2011 Apr 12.