• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Appropriate cutoff for treatment of distal ureteral stones by single session in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

作者信息

Akhtar Sobia, Ather M Hammad

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6):1165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.015
PMID:16360433
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine an appropriate cutoff for treatment by single session in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a prevesical stone by determining the differences in the efficiency quotient (EQ).

METHODS

This was a review of a series of patients who underwent shock wave lithotripsy for a primary, single, prevesical stone from January 1995 to June 2003. All 153 patients were treated using a Dornier MPL 9000 lithotripter in the prone position under intravenous sedation. The stone size was measured in two dimensions (parallel and perpendicular to the long axis of the ureter). The EQ was calculated using a standard formula.

RESULTS

Of the 153 patients, 141 (92.2%) were stone free within a mean period of 12.2 +/- 12.2 days (EQ 68.8). No significant complications occurred, and none of the patients required admission. The treatment failed in 10 patients (6.5%), who subsequently required an ancillary procedure (ureteroscopy). Statistically, we found 7 mm to be an appropriate cutoff for treatment using in situ shock wave lithotripsy. The EQ for stones greater than 7 mm and those 7 mm or smaller was 58 and 81, with a stone-free period of 13.6 +/- 12.9 and 10.9 +/- 11.6 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided shock wave lithotripsy is an efficient and safe modality for the treatment of prevesical stones 7 mm or less. Using an echo-guided lithotripter, the treatment was a radiation-free, day care procedure performed under intravenous sedation. Only 11% of our patients required repeat treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
Appropriate cutoff for treatment of distal ureteral stones by single session in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6):1165-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.015.
2
[Extracorporeal lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the treatment of calculi of the lower ureter].体外冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜术治疗输尿管下段结石
Prog Urol. 1993 Feb;3(1):48-53.
3
Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment.初次治疗失败后输尿管结石重复冲击波碎石术的成功率较低。
J Urol. 2000 Dec;164(6):1905-7.
4
Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.用于预测体外冲击波碎石术后结石清除率的术前列线图。
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089.
5
Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi.比较冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管下段结石的前瞻性随机试验。
J Urol. 2001 Oct;166(4):1255-60.
6
Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?肾积水程度会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的成功率吗?
Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.010.
7
Outpatient basis extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureter stones: efficacy of the third generation lithotripter as the first line treatment.门诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石:第三代碎石机作为一线治疗的疗效
Int J Urol. 2008 Mar;15(3):210-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01970.x.
8
Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.治疗近端输尿管结石的效率与成本:冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查联合钬:钇铝石榴石激光治疗的比较
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040.
9
[Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].[冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石——单机构661例连续病例经验]
Harefuah. 2005 Sep;144(9):605-8, 680, 679.
10
A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of transureteral and shock wave lithotripsy--which is the best minimally invasive modality to treat distal ureteral calculi in children?多中心、随机、对照临床试验:经尿道输尿管镜碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术,哪种是治疗儿童远端输尿管结石的最佳微创方式?
J Urol. 2010 Sep;184(3):1106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.021. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for proximal and distal ureteric stones.近端与远端输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的比较研究
Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(1):23-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-007-9214-x. Epub 2007 Jul 24.