Moore David J, Palmer Barton W, Patterson Thomas L, Jeste Dilip V
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, VA San Diego Healthcare System, 116A-13, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92161, United States.
J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Jan-Feb;41(1-2):97-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.10.008. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
There is growing recognition of the need to consider the effect of mental health treatments on functional independence/abilities, in addition to any effects on primary symptoms. A variety of performance-based measures of functional living skills have appeared in the medical literature over the past 25 years in discipline-specific journals, but there has been little attempt to synthesize this information to guide mental health clinicians and researchers in choosing among the available measures. Thus, the goal of the present review was (1) to identify and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of currently available performance-based assessments of functional living skills for adult populations, and (2) to make specific recommendations regarding use of currently available instruments as well as recommendations for future instrument development. Through a comprehensive search of electronic citation databases for English-language articles on performance-based instruments, as well as via cross-referenced articles in the bibliography of each initially identified article, we identified 94 relevant articles covering 31 instruments, including 20 multi-domain instrument batteries, and 11 additional domain-specific performance-based instruments. Most identified instruments provided evidence of adequate reliability, but empirical data regarding the predictive validity of each scale in terms of actual "real world functioning" was less prevalent. Several good performance-based measures have been developed for individuals with dementia, psychiatric illnesses, and older healthy individuals. Future instrument development may benefit from a focus on brevity, empirical item selection as determined by patients/caregivers, predictive validity with an emphasis on change in functioning over time, and the relationship of performance to levels of competency required for the completion of everyday tasks.
人们越来越认识到,除了考虑心理健康治疗对主要症状的任何影响外,还需要考虑其对功能独立性/能力的影响。在过去25年中,针对特定学科的期刊上出现了各种基于表现的功能生活技能测量方法,但几乎没有人试图综合这些信息,以指导心理健康临床医生和研究人员在现有测量方法中进行选择。因此,本综述的目的是:(1)识别和评估目前可用的针对成年人群的基于表现的功能生活技能评估方法的优缺点;(2)就目前可用工具的使用提出具体建议,并为未来工具的开发提出建议。通过全面搜索电子引文数据库,查找关于基于表现的工具的英文文章,并通过对每篇最初确定文章的参考文献中的交叉引用文章进行检索,我们识别出94篇相关文章,涵盖31种工具,包括20种多领域工具组,以及11种其他基于特定领域表现的工具。大多数已识别的工具都提供了足够可靠性的证据,但关于每个量表在实际“现实世界功能”方面的预测效度的实证数据则较少见。已经为患有痴呆症、精神疾病的个体以及健康的老年人开发了几种良好的基于表现的测量方法。未来工具的开发可能会受益于关注简短性、由患者/护理人员确定的实证项目选择、强调随时间变化的功能预测效度,以及表现与完成日常任务所需能力水平之间的关系。