Suppr超能文献

痴呆症患者认知和感知功能下降的轨迹:来自 IDEAL 计划的研究结果。

Trajectories of cognitive and perceived functional decline in people with dementia: Findings from the IDEAL programme.

机构信息

Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK.

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jan;20(1):410-420. doi: 10.1002/alz.13448. Epub 2023 Sep 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Impaired cognition and instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) are key diagnostic features of dementia; however, few studies have compared trajectories of cognition and iADL.

METHODS

Participants from the IDEAL study comprised 1537, 1183, and 851 people with dementia, and 1277, 977, and 749 caregivers at baseline, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III and Functional Activities Questionnaire were used to measure cognition and iADL, respectively. Scores were converted to deciles.

RESULTS

Self-rated iADL declined on average by -0.08 (-0.25, 0.08) decile points per timepoint more than cognition. Informant-rated iADL declined on average by -0.31 (-0.43, -0.18) decile points per timepoint more than cognition.

DISCUSSION

Cognition and self-rated iADL declined at a similar rate. Informant-rated iADL declined at a significantly greater rate than cognition. Therefore, either cognition and perceived iADL decline at different rates or informants overestimate increasing iADL difficulties compared to both cognition and self-ratings.

HIGHLIGHTS

Self-ratings of the degree of functional difficulties were consistent with cognition Decline in self-rated everyday activities was consistent with cognitive decline Informant-ratings of everyday activities declined more than cognition.

摘要

简介

认知障碍和日常生活活动能力(iADL)是痴呆的主要诊断特征;然而,很少有研究比较认知和 iADL 的轨迹。

方法

IDEAL 研究的参与者包括 1537 名、1183 名和 851 名痴呆症患者,以及 1277 名、977 名和 749 名护理人员,分别在基线、12 个月和 24 个月时进行评估。使用 Addenbrooke 认知评估-III 和功能活动问卷分别测量认知和 iADL。得分转换为十分位数。

结果

自我报告的 iADL 平均每个时间点下降-0.08(-0.25,0.08)十分位数,比认知下降更快。知情者报告的 iADL 平均每个时间点下降-0.31(-0.43,-0.18)十分位数,比认知下降更快。

讨论

认知和自我报告的 iADL 以相似的速度下降。知情者报告的 iADL 下降速度明显快于认知。因此,要么认知和感知的 iADL 以不同的速度下降,要么知情者对 iADL 困难的增加的评估高于认知和自我评估。

要点

自我评估的功能障碍程度与认知一致 自我报告的日常活动能力下降与认知下降一致 知情者对日常活动的评估比认知下降更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ef/10916967/80646dd2f2c8/ALZ-20-410-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验