Bremnes Roy M, Camps Carlos, Sirera Rafael
Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø.
Lung Cancer. 2006 Feb;51(2):143-58. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.09.005. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
Due to a dismal prognosis of advanced lung cancer, novel screening tools and more effective treatments are clearly needed. Lately, an increasing number of tumour-released angiogenic cytokines which affect vessel formation, tumour growth, invasion, and metastasis have been identified. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) are among the most important angiogenic factors. Based on available literature, we have explored the mechanisms of angiogenesis and its prognostic significance in non-small cell lung cancer, estimated by microvessel density (MVD) and the presence of VEGF and bFGF in the tumour and blood from NSCLC patients.
Several comprehensive Pubmed searches for the period January 1993 to May 2005 were performed using strategic combinations of the terms non-small cell lung cancer, angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, tumour expression, microvessel density, circulating, and serum.
NSCLC neoangiogenesis, as measured by MVD, and tumour expression of VEGF are poor prognostic factors for survival (MVD, HR 1.8-2.0; VEGF, HR 1.5). bFGF tumour expression is also associated with poor survival and more aggressive disease. When evaluating the prognostic impact of elevated VEGF levels in blood, 10 of 16 studies (63%) indicated a negative prognostic impact. Of five studies on the prognostic value of circulating bFGF, three studies reported a negative prognostic impact, while one indicated bFGF as a good prognostic factor and one was inconclusive.
Angiogenic factors are poor prognostic indicators for tumour aggressiveness and survival in NSCLC. Assessments of circulating levels of VEGF and possibly bFGF may be valuable future tools for treatment planning and monitoring of treatment effect and relapse. First, however, these blood tests need to be standardised and validated in large-scale prospective clinical trials.
由于晚期肺癌预后不佳,显然需要新的筛查工具和更有效的治疗方法。最近,已鉴定出越来越多影响血管形成、肿瘤生长、侵袭和转移的肿瘤释放血管生成细胞因子。血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)是最重要的血管生成因子。基于现有文献,我们探讨了非小细胞肺癌中血管生成的机制及其预后意义,通过微血管密度(MVD)以及非小细胞肺癌患者肿瘤和血液中VEGF和bFGF的存在情况进行评估。
利用非小细胞肺癌、血管生成、血管内皮生长因子、碱性成纤维细胞生长因子、肿瘤表达、微血管密度、循环和血清等术语的策略性组合,对1993年1月至2005年5月期间的PubMed进行了几次全面检索。
通过MVD测量的非小细胞肺癌新生血管生成以及VEGF的肿瘤表达是生存的不良预后因素(MVD,风险比1.8 - 2.0;VEGF,风险比1.5)。bFGF肿瘤表达也与生存不良和疾病侵袭性更强有关。在评估血液中VEGF水平升高的预后影响时,16项研究中的10项(63%)表明具有负面预后影响。在关于循环bFGF预后价值的5项研究中,3项研究报告了负面预后影响,1项表明bFGF是良好的预后因素,1项尚无定论。
血管生成因子是非小细胞肺癌肿瘤侵袭性和生存的不良预后指标。评估循环中的VEGF水平以及可能的bFGF水平可能是未来治疗规划以及监测治疗效果和复发的有价值工具。然而,首先这些血液检测需要在大规模前瞻性临床试验中进行标准化和验证。