Rubin Janet, Rubin Clinton, Jacobs Christopher Rae
Department of Medicine, VAMC and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta GA, VAMC-151, 1670 Clairmont Rd, Decatur, GA 30033, USA.
Gene. 2006 Feb 15;367:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.028. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
Bone tissue has the capacity to adapt to its functional environment such that its morphology is "optimized" for the mechanical demand. The adaptive nature of the skeleton poses an interesting set of biological questions (e.g., how does bone sense mechanical signals, what cells are the sensing system, what are the mechanical signals that drive the system, what receptors are responsible for transducing the mechanical signal, what are the molecular responses to the mechanical stimuli). Studies of the characteristics of the mechanical environment at the cellular level, the forces that bone cells recognize, and the integrated cellular responses are providing new information at an accelerating speed. This review first considers the mechanical factors that are generated by loading in the skeleton, including strain, stress and pressure. Mechanosensitive cells placed to recognize these forces in the skeleton, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes and cells of the vasculature are reviewed. The identity of the mechanoreceptor(s) is approached, with consideration of ion channels, integrins, connexins, the lipid membrane including caveolar and non-caveolar lipid rafts and the possibility that altering cell shape at the membrane or cytoskeleton alters integral signaling protein associations. The distal intracellular signaling systems on-line after the mechanoreceptor is activated are reviewed, including those emanating from G-proteins (e.g., intracellular calcium shifts), MAPKs, and nitric oxide. The ability to harness mechanical signals to improve bone health through devices and exercise is broached. Increased appreciation of the importance of the mechanical environment in regulating and determining the structural efficacy of the skeleton makes this an exciting time for further exploration of this area.
骨组织有能力适应其功能环境,从而使其形态针对机械需求进行“优化”。骨骼的适应性本质引发了一系列有趣的生物学问题(例如,骨骼如何感知机械信号,传感系统是哪些细胞,驱动该系统的机械信号是什么,负责转导机械信号的受体是什么,对机械刺激的分子反应是什么)。对细胞水平上机械环境的特征、骨细胞识别的力以及整合的细胞反应的研究正在以加速的速度提供新信息。本综述首先考虑骨骼加载产生的机械因素,包括应变、应力和压力。回顾了放置在骨骼中以识别这些力的机械敏感细胞,即成骨细胞、破骨细胞、骨细胞和脉管系统细胞。探讨了机械感受器的身份,考虑了离子通道、整合素、连接蛋白、包括小窝和非小窝脂筏在内的脂质膜,以及细胞膜或细胞骨架处细胞形状的改变是否会改变完整信号蛋白关联的可能性。回顾了机械感受器激活后在线的远端细胞内信号系统,包括那些源自G蛋白(例如细胞内钙转移)、丝裂原活化蛋白激酶和一氧化氮的信号系统。还探讨了通过设备和运动利用机械信号改善骨骼健康的能力。对机械环境在调节和决定骨骼结构功效方面重要性的日益认识,使得这成为进一步探索该领域的激动人心的时刻。