文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

使用倾向评分对胆总管结石治疗中院内资源利用情况进行的全国性分析。

National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.

作者信息

Poulose B K, Arbogast P G, Holzman M D

机构信息

Section of Surgical Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, A-1124 Medical Center North, 1161 21st Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):186-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0235-1. Epub 2005 Dec 9.


DOI:10.1007/s00464-005-0235-1
PMID:16362476
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two treatment options exist for choledocholithiasis (CDL): endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Resource utilization measured by total in-hospital charges (THC) and length of stay (LOS) was compared using the propensity score (PS). In this study, PS was the probability that a patient received CBDE based on comorbidities and demographics. The power of this method lies in balancing groups on variables by PS, resulting in 90% bias reduction and improved inferential validity compared to traditional analytic techniques. METHODS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) patients with CDL who had ERCP or CBDE were identified in the 2002 U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients were ordered into five PS balanced strata. Mean THC, LOS, and estimated costs were compared. A linear regression model was used to estimate the contribution that LOS had on estimated costs. Monetary values were adjusted to 2004 dollars. RESULTS: A total of 40,982 patients underwent LC with CDL in 2002; 27,739 had either ERCP (93%) or CBDE (7%). Mean age was 52.7 +/- 0.4 years, with 74% women. Mean THC were less for CBDE (25,200 dollars +/- 1,800 dollars) than for ERCP (29,900 dollars +/- 800 dollars, p < 0.05). Mean LOS was less for CBDE (4.9 +/- 0.2 days) than for ERCP (5.6 +/- 0.1 days, p < 0.05). PS adjusted analysis revealed an estimated overall cost savings of 4,500 dollars +/- 1,600 dollars and reduced LOS (0.6 +/- 0.2 days) per hospitalization for CBDE. Mean THC, LOS, and estimated costs across PS score balanced strata were generally higher in the ERCP group compared to the CBDE group. LOS contributed 53% to increased THC and 62% of estimated costs. A higher cumulative incidence of complications was evident with CBDE (0.5-4.6%) compared to ERCP (0.3-3.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this PS analysis, CBDE incurs less THC, reduces LOS, and has less estimated costs for CDL compared to ERCP. Furthermore, CBDE appears to be dramatically underutilized.

摘要

背景:胆总管结石(CDL)有两种治疗选择:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)和胆总管探查术(CBDE)。使用倾向评分(PS)比较了以住院总费用(THC)和住院时间(LOS)衡量的资源利用情况。在本研究中,PS是患者基于合并症和人口统计学接受CBDE的概率。该方法的优势在于通过PS平衡各变量组,与传统分析技术相比,可减少90%的偏差并提高推理效度。 方法:在2002年美国全国住院患者样本中识别出接受ERCP或CBDE治疗的CDL腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者。将患者分为五个PS平衡层。比较平均THC、LOS和估计成本。使用线性回归模型估计LOS对估计成本的贡献。货币价值调整为2004年美元。 结果:2002年共有40982例患者接受了LC合并CDL治疗;27739例接受了ERCP(93%)或CBDE(7%)。平均年龄为52.7±0.4岁,女性占74%。CBDE的平均THC(25200美元±1800美元)低于ERCP(29900美元±800美元,p<0.05)。CBDE的平均LOS(4.9±0.2天)低于ERCP(5.6±0.1天,p<0.05)。PS调整分析显示,CBDE每次住院估计总体成本节省4500美元±1600美元,LOS缩短(0.6±0.2天)。与CBDE组相比,ERCP组PS评分平衡层的平均THC、LOS和估计成本总体更高。LOS对THC增加的贡献率为53%,对估计成本的贡献率为62%。与ERCP(0.3 - 3.6%)相比,CBDE的并发症累积发生率更高(0.5 - 4.6%)。 结论:基于该PS分析,与ERCP相比,CBDE治疗CDL的THC更低,LOS更短,估计成本更低。此外,CBDE的使用似乎严重不足。

相似文献

[1]
National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.

Surg Endosc. 2006-2

[2]
Management of Choledocholithiasis in a Community Hospital: Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Am Surg. 2024-8

[3]
Nationwide Assessment of Trends in Choledocholithiasis Management in the United States From 1998 to 2013.

JAMA Surg. 2016-12-1

[4]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in children is associated with decreased cost and length of stay: results of a two-center analysis.

J Pediatr Surg. 2013-1

[5]
Optimizing choledocholithiasis management: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Arch Surg. 2007-1

[6]
Pediatric Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: An Opportunity to Decrease ERCP Complications.

J Surg Res. 2019-5-23

[7]
Comparison of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy with operative management of gallstone pancreatitis.

Am J Surg. 1997-12

[8]
Cost analysis of robot-assisted choledochotomy and common bile duct exploration as an option for complex choledocholithiasis.

Surg Endosc. 2017-8-15

[9]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is an effective, safe, and less-costly method of treating choledocholithiasis.

Surg Endosc. 2024-10

[10]
Same-day combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholecystectomy: Achievable and minimizes costs.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Impact of bile duct stenting on the management of symptomatic choledocholithiasis: a retrospective multicenter analysis.

Front Surg. 2025-7-23

[2]
Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration: 8-Year Experience at a Single Institution.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2023-3

[3]
Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention.

J Clin Med Res. 2022-11

[4]
Laparo-endoscopic management of chole-choledocholithiasis: Rendezvous or intraoperative ERCP? A single tertiary care center experience.

Front Surg. 2022-8-31

[5]
Outcomes following balloon sphincteroplasty as an adjunct to laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Surg Endosc. 2023-5

[6]
The single-stage management of bile duct stones is underutilised: A prospective multicentre cohort study with a literature review.

Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2022-11-30

[7]
The role of cholecystectomy following endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal.

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023-9

[8]
Cutting out Cholecystectomy on Index Hospitalization Leads to Increased Readmission Rates, Morbidity, Mortality and Cost.

Diseases. 2021-12-6

[9]
Choledocholithiasis-a new clinical pathway.

Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021-7-25

[10]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2018-12-3

本文引用的文献

[1]
NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy.

NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002

[2]
Inpatient costs of major cardiovascular events.

Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2001

[3]
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Ann Surg. 2004-1

[4]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Surg Endosc. 2003-11

[5]
The case for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002

[6]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study.

Minerva Chir. 2002-8

[7]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001-12

[8]
Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Surg Endosc. 2001-1

[9]
E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi.

Surg Endosc. 1999-10

[10]
Invited commentary: propensity scores.

Am J Epidemiol. 1999-8-15

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索