Dubinsky S, Gamble D J, Rogers M L
Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University.
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):62-70. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_12.
This article chronologically reviews the literature relating to subtle and obvious items of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Wiener's original development of subtle and obvious subscales, Seeman's support for the concept of subtlety, and Duffs arguments concerning empirical versus face validity are discussed. Later research exploring demand characteristics are then reviewed, such as the paradoxical relationships under differing instruction sets and population issues. The work from Auburn University researchers on the development of a 5-point subtlety scale, the interaction with personality factors, and individual scale research is critiqued.
本文按时间顺序回顾了与明尼苏达多相人格调查表的细微和明显项目相关的文献。讨论了维纳对细微和明显分量表的最初开发、西曼对微妙性概念的支持,以及达夫斯关于实证效度与表面效度的论点。随后回顾了探索需求特征的后期研究,例如不同指令集下的矛盾关系和总体问题。对奥本大学研究人员在5点微妙性量表的开发、与人格因素的相互作用以及单个量表研究方面的工作进行了批判。