Nichols D S
Oregon State Hospital-Portland, 97232, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1996 Dec;67(3):516-28. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_8.
An impressionistic list of methodological considerations that may be of consequence in Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-Rorschach studies is presented. These include the potential effects of the multidimensionality of the basic clinical MMPI scales in comparison studies, issues of deception and response style in such studies, and the rote of theory in guiding the selection of variables in the search for MMPI-Rorschach correspondences. The recently established necessity of controls for the total number of Rorschach responses provides the basis for suggestions for further controls in MMPI-Rorschach studies, including those for level of distress and for the minimization/exaggeration of psychopathology. An effort is made to contrast these two instruments in terms borrowed from information theory as a way of illuminating their complementary aspects, and suggesting means by which each may contribute to an enhanced understanding of the other.
本文列出了一些在明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)-罗夏墨迹测验研究中可能具有重要意义的方法学考量。这些考量包括在比较研究中基本临床MMPI量表多维性的潜在影响、此类研究中的欺骗和反应风格问题,以及理论在指导寻找MMPI-罗夏墨迹测验对应关系时变量选择方面的作用。最近确定的对罗夏墨迹测验反应总数进行控制的必要性,为MMPI-罗夏墨迹测验研究中进一步控制的建议提供了基础,包括对痛苦程度以及心理病理学最小化/夸大方面的控制。本文尝试用信息论中的术语来对比这两种工具,以此阐明它们的互补之处,并提出使每种工具都能有助于增进对另一种工具理解的方法。