Suppr超能文献

停止透析:伦理问题。

Withdrawal from dialysis: ethical issues.

作者信息

Conneen S, Tzamaloukas A H, Adler K, Keller L K, Bordenave K, Murata G H

机构信息

Medical Ethics Committee, Renal Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

Dial Transplant. 1998 Apr;27(4):200, 202-4.

Abstract

Since 1991, death following withdrawal from dialysis has increased greatly in our dialysis unit. This report is based on our observations of those patients who followed that course. Four types of patients who withdrew from dialysis were identified: those with a terminal illness, demented patients, those with a progressive disability, and those who had no serious medical problem other than end-stage renal failure. We analyzed the risk factors for withdrawal and attempted to define the ethical principles involved in each patient category. The authors conclude that although the decision of a competent patient to stop dialysis must be honored, some of those deaths might be preventable if patients on chronic dialysis are prospectively followed and treated by those who are expert in the behavior of patients with chronic illness.

摘要

自1991年以来,我们透析单位中停止透析后的死亡人数大幅增加。本报告基于我们对那些遵循该病程的患者的观察。确定了四类停止透析的患者:患有晚期疾病的患者、痴呆患者、患有进行性残疾的患者以及除终末期肾衰竭外没有严重医疗问题的患者。我们分析了停止透析的风险因素,并试图确定涉及每个患者类别的伦理原则。作者得出结论,尽管必须尊重有行为能力的患者停止透析的决定,但如果对长期透析患者进行前瞻性跟踪并由慢性病患者行为方面的专家进行治疗,其中一些死亡可能是可以预防的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验