Noble Helen, Meyer Julienne, Bridges Jackie, Kelly Daniel, Johnson Barbara
Institute of Health Science, City University, London, UK.
J Ren Care. 2008 Jun;34(2):94-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2008.00017.x.
Aim. The aim of this literature review was to advance understanding of dialysis refusal and withdrawal in relation to the experiences of patients and carers and to explore the trajectory to death of those abating dialysis. Method. Databases searched included CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, British Nursing Index, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, ASSIA and Cancerlit. Forty-four quantitative papers and two qualitative papers were identified. Findings. The patient and carer experience is rarely explored in the literature but issues related to 'Making decisions to withhold/forego or withdraw treatment', 'Length of survival without dialysis', Prevalence of symptoms in end-stage renal disease', 'The utilisation of Advance Directives' and 'The impact on families' throw some light on the phenomena of dialysis refusal and withdrawal. Conclusions. Little is known about those patients who withdraw from or decide not to commence dialysis. Empirical studies related to those who opt not to embark on dialysis are limited to four worldwide. There is an urgent need for further research to determine the experiences and needs of this population and a more patient-centred approach is required, consistent with modern palliative medicine.
目的。本综述的目的是加深对与患者及护理人员经历相关的透析拒绝和撤机的理解,并探究停止透析者的死亡轨迹。方法。检索的数据库包括护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、医学索引数据库(Medline)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、英国护理索引、社会科学国际文献目录、应用社会科学索引与摘要数据库(ASSIA)以及癌症文献数据库(Cancerlit)。共识别出44篇定量研究论文和2篇定性研究论文。结果。患者及护理人员的经历在文献中很少被探讨,但与“做出停止/放弃或撤机治疗的决定”、“无透析生存期”、“终末期肾病症状的发生率”、“预立医疗指示的使用”以及“对家庭的影响”相关的问题,为透析拒绝和撤机现象提供了一些线索。结论。对于那些停止透析或决定不开始透析的患者,我们知之甚少。全球范围内,与选择不进行透析者相关的实证研究仅有四项。迫切需要进一步研究以确定这一人群的经历和需求,并且需要一种更以患者为中心的方法,这与现代姑息医学相一致。