Marwit S J
Dept. of Psychology, University of Missouri, St Louis 63121, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1981 Dec;45(6):593-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4506_5.
Seventy-seven female and 86 male psychologist practitioners filled out the Bem Sex Rote Inventory to describe either a healthy adult male, healthy adult female, or healthy adult, sex unspecified. Analyzing the data according to Bem's classification of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny produced a significant Scale X Condition interaction with male and female practitioners ascribing significantly more masculine than feminine traits to healthy adult men, yet displaying no comparable differences when rating healthy adult women. Analyzing the data according to Spence's classification of masculine, feminine, androgynous, and undifferentiated produced a Group X Condition interaction with practitioners ascribing significantly more masculine traits to healthy adult men and significantly more feminine traits to healthy adult women. Reanalyses omitting "masculine" and "feminine" from Bem's fist of sex-typed traits produced nonsignificant results. The relationship of this to recent criticisms of the construct validity of the BSRI and to the validity of earlier results of therapist sex-role bias was discussed.
77名女性和86名男性心理医生填写了贝姆性别角色量表，以描述健康成年男性、健康成年女性或未明确性别的健康成年人。根据贝姆对男性气质、女性气质和双性化的分类对数据进行分析，结果显示量表X条件存在显著交互作用，男性和女性从业者认为健康成年男性具有的男性特质明显多于女性特质，但在对健康成年女性进行评分时却没有类似差异。根据斯彭斯对男性化、女性化、双性化和未分化的分类对数据进行分析，结果显示组X条件存在交互作用，从业者认为健康成年男性具有更多的男性特质，而健康成年女性具有更多的女性特质。在贝姆的性别类型特质列表中省略“男性化”和“女性化”后重新分析，结果不显著。本文讨论了这一结果与近期对贝姆性别角色量表结构效度的批评以及治疗师性别角色偏见早期结果的效度之间的关系。
