Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中:扩散加权磁共振成像的准确性——b值和脑脊液抑制的影响

Acute ischemic stroke: accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging--effects of b value and cerebrospinal fluid suppression.

作者信息

Chen Philip E, Simon Jessica E, Hill Michael D, Sohn Chul-Ho, Dickhoff Peter, Morrish William F, Sevick Robert J, Frayne Richard

机构信息

Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary Health Region, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.

出版信息

Radiology. 2006 Jan;238(1):232-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2381041113.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To prospectively determine which diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique (ie, conventional diffusion-weighted MR imaging [b = 1000 or 1500 sec/mm2] or fluid-inversion prepared diffusion [FLIPD] MR imaging [b = 1500 sec/mm2]) is most accurate in depicting acute ischemic stroke at 3 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Health Research Ethics Board approved this study; written informed consent was provided by all participants or their surrogate. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was performed in 75 consecutive patients (43 men, 32 women; mean age, 64.0 years) with acute ischemic stroke. Two experienced neuroradiologists determined the presence of hyperacute stroke lesions at diffusion-weighted MR imaging by locating areas of hyperintensity that corresponded to regions with a decreased diffusion coefficient. These findings were used as the reference standard. Four raters who were blinded to patient history assessed all images and apparent diffusion coefficient maps for the presence of changes that were consistent with acute ischemic stroke. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and inter- and intrarater reliability scores were calculated for each technique.

RESULTS

Specificity, positive predictive value, and accuracy were not significantly different among the techniques. FLIPD MR images obtained with a b value of 1500 sec/mm2 had decreased sensitivity for acute ischemic stroke (mean, 61.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.4%, 67.9%) compared with conventional diffusion-weighted MR images obtained with a b value of either 1000 sec/mm2 (mean, 82.5%; 95% CI: 77.1%, 87.0%) or 1500 sec/mm2 (mean, 84.5%; 95% CI: 79.3%, 88.9%). FLIPD MR images also had decreased negative predictive value (mean, 96.5%; 95% CI: 95.7%, 97.2%) compared with conventional diffusion-weighted MR images obtained with a b value of either 1000 sec/mm2 (mean, 98.4%; 95% CI: 97.8%, 98.8%) or 1500 sec/mm2 (mean, 98.6%; 95% CI: 98.1%, 99.0%). Intra- and interrater reliability scores were generally excellent for all three techniques.

CONCLUSION

FLIPD MR images obtained with a b value of 1500 sec/mm2 are less suitable for the detection of acute ischemic stroke owing to a decreased sensitivity and negative predictive value. The performance of the two conventional diffusion-weighted MR imaging techniques (b = 1000 and 1500 sec/mm2) was equivalent.

摘要

目的

前瞻性地确定哪种扩散加权磁共振(MR)成像技术(即传统扩散加权MR成像[b = 1000或1500秒/平方毫米]或液体反转恢复准备扩散[FLIPD] MR成像[b = 1500秒/平方毫米])在3T时描绘急性缺血性卒中最为准确。

材料与方法

健康研究伦理委员会批准了本研究;所有参与者或其代理人提供了书面知情同意书。对75例连续的急性缺血性卒中患者(43例男性,32例女性;平均年龄64.0岁)进行了扩散加权MR成像。两名经验丰富的神经放射科医生通过定位与扩散系数降低区域相对应的高强度区域,在扩散加权MR成像上确定超急性卒中病变的存在。这些发现被用作参考标准。四名对患者病史不知情的评估者对所有图像和表观扩散系数图进行评估,以确定是否存在与急性缺血性卒中一致的变化。计算每种技术的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值、阳性预测值以及评估者间和评估者内的可靠性评分。

结果

各技术之间的特异性、阳性预测值和准确性无显著差异。与b值为1000秒/平方毫米(平均82.5%;95%置信区间[CI]:77.1%,87.0%)或1500秒/平方毫米(平均84.5%;95%CI:79.3%,88.9%)的传统扩散加权MR图像相比,b值为1500秒/平方毫米的FLIPD MR图像对急性缺血性卒中的敏感性降低(平均61.8%;95%CI:55.4%,67.9%)。与b值为1000秒/平方毫米(平均98.4%;95%CI:97.8%,98.8%)或1500秒/平方毫米(平均98.6%;95%CI:98.1%,99.0%)的传统扩散加权MR图像相比,FLIPD MR图像的阴性预测值也降低(平均96.5%;95%CI:95.7%,97.2%)。对于所有三种技术,评估者内和评估者间的可靠性评分总体上都非常好。

结论

b值为1500秒/平方毫米的FLIPD MR图像由于敏感性和阴性预测值降低,不太适合检测急性缺血性卒中。两种传统扩散加权MR成像技术(b = 1000和1500秒/平方毫米)的性能相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验