• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从环境中的直接体验获取空间知识:度量知识发展中的个体差异以及对分别习得地点的整合。

Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

作者信息

Ishikawa Toru, Montello Daniel R

机构信息

University of California, Santa Barbara, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2006 Mar;52(2):93-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003
PMID:16375882
Abstract

Existing frameworks for explaining spatial knowledge acquisition in a new environment propose either stage-like or continuous development. To examine the spatial microgenesis of individuals, a longitudinal study was conducted. Twenty-four college students were individually driven along two routes in a previously unfamiliar neighborhood over 10 weekly sessions. Starting Session 4, they were also driven along a short connecting route. After each session, participants estimated spatial properties of the routes. Some participants' knowledge improved fairly continuously over the sessions, but most participants either manifested accurate metric knowledge from the first session or never manifested accurate metric knowledge. Results are discussed in light of these large individual differences, particularly with respect to the accuracy and development of integrated configurational knowledge.

摘要

现有的关于解释在新环境中空间知识获取的框架提出了阶段性或连续性发展两种观点。为了研究个体的空间微观发生过程,进行了一项纵向研究。24名大学生在10周的时间里,被分别沿着之前不熟悉的社区中的两条路线乘车行驶。从第4次会话开始,他们还被沿着一条短的连接路线行驶。每次会话后,参与者估计路线的空间属性。一些参与者的知识在会话过程中相当持续地得到改善,但大多数参与者要么从第一次会话就表现出准确的度量知识,要么从未表现出准确的度量知识。鉴于这些巨大的个体差异,特别是关于综合构型知识的准确性和发展,对结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.从环境中的直接体验获取空间知识:度量知识发展中的个体差异以及对分别习得地点的整合。
Cogn Psychol. 2006 Mar;52(2):93-129. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
2
Assessing the symbolic distance effect in mental images constructed from verbal descriptions: a study of individual differences in the mental comparison of distances.评估基于言语描述构建的心理意象中的符号距离效应:一项关于距离心理比较中个体差异的研究。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):197-210. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
3
Individual differences in the encoding processes of egocentric and allocentric survey knowledge.自我中心和客观定向的调查知识编码过程中的个体差异。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):176-92. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12005. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
4
Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts.人类会将路线整合到认知地图中吗?基于地图与基于地标的新捷径导航。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Mar;31(2):195-215. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.195.
5
[Effects of knowledge acquisition on verbal linearization about spatial orientation].[知识获取对空间定向言语线性化的影响]
Z Exp Psychol. 2000;47(1):17-33.
6
What counts as by? Young children's use of relative distance to judge nearbyness.什么算近呢?幼儿利用相对距离来判断远近。
Dev Psychol. 2007 Jan;43(1):121-33. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.121.
7
The effect of barriers on spatial representations.屏障对空间表征的影响。
Child Dev. 1981 Sep;52(3):1087-90.
8
What do European badgers (Meles meles) know about the spatial organisation of neighbouring groups?欧洲獾(Meles meles)对相邻群体的空间组织了解多少?
Behav Processes. 2006 Mar;72(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.001. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
9
Differentiated forgetting rates of spatial knowledge in humans in the absence of repeated testing.在没有重复测试的情况下,人类空间知识的差异化遗忘率。
Memory. 2008 Oct;16(7):678-88. doi: 10.1080/09658210802286931.
10
Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information.认知地图:对现实世界距离和位置信息的认知。
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Jan;6(1):13-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Probing mental representations of space through sketch mapping: a scoping review.通过草图绘制探究空间心理表征:一项范围综述
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Sep 3;10(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00667-w.
2
Cognitive representations of multilevel buildings: two- or three-dimensional?多层建筑的认知表征:二维还是三维?
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Aug 31;243(9):202. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07136-2.
3
This is not the way: global directional cues do not improve spatial learning in an immersive virtual environment.并非如此:全局方向线索并不能改善在沉浸式虚拟环境中的空间学习。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 7;10(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00654-1.
4
Navigating by Design: Effects of Individual Differences and Navigation Modality on Spatial Memory Acquisition.设计导航:个体差异和导航方式对空间记忆获取的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;15(7):959. doi: 10.3390/bs15070959.
5
Does injury proneness aid or impair navigation ability? A study on self-reported errors, risk and evaluation behaviors in relation to sense of direction.易受伤倾向对导航能力有帮助还是有损害?一项关于与方向感相关的自我报告错误、风险和评估行为的研究。
Cogn Process. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01291-8.
6
Individual differences in navigation skill: towards reliable and valid measures.导航技能的个体差异:迈向可靠且有效的测量方法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 7;10(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00642-5.
7
Social and spatial predictors of collective search behaviors.集体搜索行为的社会和空间预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 30;15(1):19086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02460-7.
8
The Validation of the Danish Version of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale (SBSoDDK) and a Comparison of Performance on the SBSoD Across Samples with Different Nationalities.丹麦版圣巴巴拉方向感量表(SBSoDDK)的效度验证以及不同国籍样本在圣巴巴拉方向感量表(SBSoD)上的表现比较。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 9;15(3):334. doi: 10.3390/bs15030334.
9
Dual Assessment of Developmental Topographical Disorientation: Comparing Self-Reported Measures with Actual Navigational Performance.发育性地形定向障碍的双重评估:自我报告测量与实际导航表现的比较
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):318. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030318.
10
Learning the layout of different environments: common or dissociated abilities?学习不同环境的布局:共同能力还是分离能力?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Feb 21;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00618-5.