• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计导航:个体差异和导航方式对空间记忆获取的影响。

Navigating by Design: Effects of Individual Differences and Navigation Modality on Spatial Memory Acquisition.

作者信息

Liu Xianyun, Zhang Yanan, Sun Baihu

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.

Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;15(7):959. doi: 10.3390/bs15070959.

DOI:10.3390/bs15070959
PMID:40723742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12292535/
Abstract

Spatial memory is a critical component of spatial cognition, particularly in unfamiliar environments. As navigation systems become integral to daily life, understanding how individuals with varying spatial abilities respond to different navigation modes is increasingly important. This study employed a virtual driving environment to examine how participants with varying spatial abilities (good or poor) performed under three navigation modes, namely visual, audio, and combined audio-visual navigation modes. A total of 78 participants were divided into two groups, good sense of direction (G-SOD) and poor sense of direction (P-SOD), according to their Santa Barbara Sense of Direction (SBSOD) scores. They were randomly assigned to one of the three navigation modes (visual, audio, audio-visual). Participants followed navigation cues and simulated driving behavior to the end point twice during the learning phase, then completed the route retracing task, recognizing scenes task and recognizing the order task. Significant main effects were found for both SOD group and navigation mode, with no interaction. G-SOD participants outperformed P-SOD participants in route retracing task. Audio navigation mode led to better performance in tasks involving complex spatial decisions, such as turn intersections and recognizing the order. The accuracy of recognizing scenes did not significantly differ across SOD groups or navigation modes. These findings suggest that audio navigation mode may reduce visual distraction and support more effective spatial encoding and that individual spatial abilities influence navigation performance independently of guidance type. These findings highlight the importance of aligning navigation modalities with users' cognitive profiles and support the development of adaptive navigation systems that accommodate individual differences in spatial ability.

摘要

空间记忆是空间认知的关键组成部分,在不熟悉的环境中尤为如此。随着导航系统成为日常生活中不可或缺的一部分,了解具有不同空间能力的个体如何对不同的导航模式做出反应变得越来越重要。本研究采用虚拟驾驶环境来考察具有不同空间能力(良好或较差)的参与者在三种导航模式下的表现,即视觉、音频和视听组合导航模式。根据他们的圣巴巴拉方向感(SBSOD)得分,共有78名参与者被分为两组,方向感良好组(G-SOD)和方向感较差组(P-SOD)。他们被随机分配到三种导航模式之一(视觉、音频、视听)。在学习阶段,参与者遵循导航提示并模拟驾驶行为到达终点两次,然后完成路线回溯任务、场景识别任务和顺序识别任务。发现SOD组和导航模式均有显著的主效应,但没有交互作用。在路线回溯任务中,G-SOD组参与者的表现优于P-SOD组参与者。音频导航模式在涉及复杂空间决策的任务中表现更好,如转弯路口和顺序识别。场景识别的准确性在不同的SOD组或导航模式之间没有显著差异。这些发现表明,音频导航模式可能会减少视觉干扰,并支持更有效的空间编码,而且个体空间能力独立于引导类型影响导航性能。这些发现强调了使导航方式与用户认知特征相匹配的重要性,并支持开发适应个体空间能力差异的自适应导航系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cd/12292535/b5cf93d4ec32/behavsci-15-00959-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cd/12292535/42555eb26aea/behavsci-15-00959-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cd/12292535/1c9c81b1f2a2/behavsci-15-00959-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cd/12292535/b5cf93d4ec32/behavsci-15-00959-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cd/12292535/42555eb26aea/behavsci-15-00959-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cd/12292535/1c9c81b1f2a2/behavsci-15-00959-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4cd/12292535/b5cf93d4ec32/behavsci-15-00959-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Navigating by Design: Effects of Individual Differences and Navigation Modality on Spatial Memory Acquisition.设计导航:个体差异和导航方式对空间记忆获取的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;15(7):959. doi: 10.3390/bs15070959.
2
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
3
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
7
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
Neurocognition in youth with versus without prediabetes.有与无糖尿病前期的青年的神经认知情况
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 23:2025.06.23.25330130. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.23.25330130.

本文引用的文献

1
Multisensory GPS impact on spatial representation in an immersive virtual reality driving game.多感觉 GPS 对沉浸式虚拟现实驾驶游戏中空间表现的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 5;12(1):7401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11124-9.
2
Developing global spatial memories by one-shot across-boundary navigation.通过单次跨边界导航来发展全球空间记忆。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Jun;48(6):798-812. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001083. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
3
Structuring Knowledge with Cognitive Maps and Cognitive Graphs.用认知图和认知图构建知识。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;25(1):37-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
4
Distraction decreases rIFG-putamen connectivity during goal-directed effort for food rewards.分心会降低指向食物奖励的目标努力过程中 rIFG-putamen 的连接性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 4;10(1):19072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76060-y.
5
Acquisition of landmark, route, and survey knowledge in a wayfinding task: in stages or in parallel?在寻路任务中获取地标、路线和测量知识:是分阶段还是并行?
Psychol Res. 2021 Jul;85(5):2098-2106. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01384-3. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
6
Gender differences in spatial navigation: Characterizing wayfinding behaviors.性别差异在空间导航中的体现:寻路行为的特征。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1933-1940. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01659-w.
7
Spatial memory in young adults: Gender differences in egocentric and allocentric performance.年轻成年人的空间记忆:自我中心和他我中心表现中的性别差异。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Feb 1;359:694-700. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.导航策略与效率中的性别差异。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):909-922. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0811-y.
9
Spontaneous attention-capture by auditory distractors as predictor of distractibility: a study of domestic horses (Equus caballus).听觉干扰物对自发注意力的捕获可预测分心程度:对家马(Equus caballus)的研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15654-5.
10
How sense-of-direction and learning intentionality relate to spatial knowledge acquisition in the environment.方向感和学习意向性如何与环境中的空间知识获取相关联。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017;2(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0057-4. Epub 2017 Mar 20.