• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦版圣巴巴拉方向感量表(SBSoDDK)的效度验证以及不同国籍样本在圣巴巴拉方向感量表(SBSoD)上的表现比较。

The Validation of the Danish Version of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale (SBSoDDK) and a Comparison of Performance on the SBSoD Across Samples with Different Nationalities.

作者信息

Gaarde Maria Beck, Gerlach Christian

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 9;15(3):334. doi: 10.3390/bs15030334.

DOI:10.3390/bs15030334
PMID:40150229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11939166/
Abstract

The Santa Barbara Sense of Direction scale (SBSoD) is a self-report scale that assesses the ability to orient oneself in the environment. With the current study, we validated the Danish version of the SBSoD (SBSoDDK) and compared performance on the SBSoD across samples with different nationalities. We collected data for a Danish sample consisting of 119 Danish university students and received data from studies validating other versions of the SBSoD using American, German, Japanese, Chinese, Turkish, and British samples. The internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity of the SBSoDDK, which exhibited a two-factor structure, were affirmed, and differences in performance on the SBSoD across samples with different nationalities were identified and may be linked to cultural variations in the sense of direction. The current study has certain weaknesses, including using nationality as a proxy for culture and variations in the gender compositions of the samples. Future studies should focus on addressing the current study's weaknesses and revising and further validating the SBSoD.

摘要

圣巴巴拉方向感量表(SBSoD)是一种自我报告量表,用于评估个体在环境中定向自己的能力。在本研究中,我们验证了丹麦语版的SBSoD(SBSoDDK),并比较了不同国籍样本在SBSoD上的表现。我们收集了由119名丹麦大学生组成的丹麦样本的数据,并从使用美国、德国、日本、中国、土耳其和英国样本验证SBSoD其他版本的研究中获取了数据。具有双因素结构的SBSoDDK的内部一致性、收敛效度和区分效度得到了肯定,并且确定了不同国籍样本在SBSoD上表现的差异,这些差异可能与方向感的文化差异有关。本研究存在一定的局限性,包括将国籍作为文化的替代指标以及样本性别构成的差异。未来的研究应专注于解决本研究的局限性,并对SBSoD进行修订和进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95cf/11939166/5675d55920ee/behavsci-15-00334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95cf/11939166/5675d55920ee/behavsci-15-00334-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95cf/11939166/5675d55920ee/behavsci-15-00334-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Validation of the Danish Version of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction Scale (SBSoDDK) and a Comparison of Performance on the SBSoD Across Samples with Different Nationalities.丹麦版圣巴巴拉方向感量表(SBSoDDK)的效度验证以及不同国籍样本在圣巴巴拉方向感量表(SBSoD)上的表现比较。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 9;15(3):334. doi: 10.3390/bs15030334.
2
Self-Reported Sense of Direction and Vestibular Function in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA).自我报告的方向感和前庭功能在巴尔的摩纵向衰老研究(BLSA)中。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021 Apr;22(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00780-1. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
3
Poor sense of direction is associated with constricted driving space in older drivers.方向感差与老年驾驶员驾驶空间受限有关。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 May;64(3):348-55. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp017. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
4
Wayfinding and path integration deficits detected using a virtual reality mobile app in patients with traumatic brain injury.使用虚拟现实移动应用程序检测创伤性脑损伤患者的寻路和路径整合缺陷。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 9;18(3):e0282255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282255. eCollection 2023.
5
Anxiety and Spatial Navigation in Williams Syndrome and Down Syndrome.威廉斯综合征与唐氏综合征患者的焦虑与空间导航能力
Dev Neuropsychol. 2022 Apr-Jun;47(3):136-157. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2022.2047685. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
Limited Longitudinal Change in Self-reported Spatial Navigation Ability in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease.临床前阿尔茨海默病患者自我报告的空间导航能力的有限纵向变化
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2022;36(1):15-21. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000487.
7
Validation of the Sense of Community Coherence Scale for German and Turkish cultures.德国和土耳其文化背景下社区凝聚感量表的效度验证
Int J Psychol. 2025 Feb;60(1):e13270. doi: 10.1002/ijop.13270. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
8
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale in China: Instrument Validation Study.《健康信息技术可用性评估量表在中国的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学验证:工具验证研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 2;27:e67948. doi: 10.2196/67948.
9
[Girls are more successful than boys at the university. Gender group differences in models integrating motivational and aggressive components correlated with Test-Anxiety].在大学里女生比男生更成功。整合动机和攻击性成分的模型中的性别群体差异与考试焦虑相关。
Encephale. 2004 Jan-Feb;30(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95410-3.
10
Danish version of 'The COPD self-efficacy scale': translation and psychometric properties.《慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我效能量表》丹麦语版本:翻译及心理测量特性
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Sep;26(3):615-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00963.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural determinants of the gap between self-estimated navigation ability and wayfinding performance: evidence from 46 countries.文化因素对自我估计导航能力与寻路表现差距的影响:来自 46 个国家的证据。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 5;13(1):10844. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30937-w.
2
A model and its fit lie in the eye of the beholder: Long live the sum score.模型及其拟合效果因人而异:总评分万岁。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:986767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986767. eCollection 2022.
3
Entropy of city street networks linked to future spatial navigation ability.
城市街道网络的熵与未来的空间导航能力有关。
Nature. 2022 Apr;604(7904):104-110. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04486-7. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
4
Contrasting domain-general and domain-specific accounts in cognitive neuropsychology: An outline of a new approach with developmental prosopagnosia as a case.认知神经心理学中领域一般与领域特定解释的对比:以发育性面孔失认症为例的一种新方法概述。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):2829-2842. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01774-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self-guided navigation.习惯性使用全球定位系统会在自主导航过程中对空间记忆产生负面影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62877-0.
6
Do questionnaires reflect their purported cognitive functions?问卷真能反映其声称的认知功能吗?
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104114. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104114. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
7
Topographic processing in developmental prosopagnosia: Preserved perception but impaired memory of scenes.发育性面孔失认症中的拓扑处理:场景感知保留但记忆受损。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 Oct-Dec;33(7-8):405-413. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1267000. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
8
I believe I'm good at orienting myself… But is that true?我相信我很擅长确定自己的方位……但这是真的吗?
Cogn Process. 2015 Aug;16(3):301-7. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0655-3. Epub 2015 May 12.
9
Variations in cognitive maps: understanding individual differences in navigation.认知地图的差异:理解导航中的个体差异。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):669-682. doi: 10.1037/a0035261. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
10
Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians.用于统计分析的正态性检验:非统计学家指南。
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Spring;10(2):486-9. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505. Epub 2012 Apr 20.