Lankester B J A, Garneti N, Gargan M F, Bannister G C
Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK.
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jun;15(6):902-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0936-0. Epub 2005 Dec 29.
Records of 277 patients presenting for medicolegal reporting following isolated whiplash injury were studied retrospectively. A range of pre-accident, accident and response variables were recorded. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the main factors that predict physical and psychological outcome after whiplash injury. The factors that showed significant association with poor outcome on both physical and psychological outcome scales were pre-injury back pain, high frequency of General Practitioner attendance, evidence of pre-injury depression or anxiety symptoms, front position in the vehicle and pain radiating away from the neck after injury. The strongest associations were with factors that are present before impact. In this selected cohort of patients, there is a physical and a psychological vulnerability that may explain the widely varied response to low violence indirect neck injury.
对277例因单纯挥鞭样损伤前来进行法医学报告的患者记录进行了回顾性研究。记录了一系列事故前、事故及反应变量。采用多变量分析来确定预测挥鞭样损伤后身体和心理结果的主要因素。在身体和心理结果量表上显示与不良结果有显著关联的因素有:伤前背痛、频繁看全科医生、伤前有抑郁或焦虑症状的证据、在车辆中的前排位置以及伤后疼痛从颈部放射至其他部位。最强的关联是与撞击前就存在的因素。在这个选定的患者队列中,存在身体和心理易损性,这可能解释了对低暴力间接颈部损伤的广泛不同反应。