Sim Leslie, Friedrich William N, Davies W Hobart, Trentham Bart, Lengua Liliana, Pithers William
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2005 Dec;18(6):697-705. doi: 10.1002/jts.20078.
Expert ratings and confirmatory factor analyses were used to derive a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), dissociation, and a combined PTSD/dissociation scale from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Validity was established by examining the relationship of these scales to features of sexual abuse thought to relate to severity and chronicity, as well as to self-report scales of PTSD and dissociation. In addition, this study examined differences between normative, psychiatric, and sexually abused children on the new scales. Both the sexual abuse and psychiatric sample differed significantly from the normative sample on all scales, but not from each other. Despite correlations of the dissociation and PTSD/dissociation combined scale with features of trauma and child self-report of PTSD and dissociation, the absence of differences between the clinical groups on the derived scales suggests that the scales measure generic, as opposed to trauma-related, distress.
采用专家评分和验证性因素分析,从儿童行为量表(CBCL)中得出创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、分离以及PTSD/分离合并量表。通过检验这些量表与被认为与严重性和慢性相关的性虐待特征以及PTSD和分离的自我报告量表之间的关系来确立效度。此外,本研究考察了正常儿童、患有精神疾病儿童和遭受性虐待儿童在新量表上的差异。性虐待样本和精神疾病样本在所有量表上均与正常样本有显著差异,但两者之间无显著差异。尽管分离量表以及PTSD/分离合并量表与创伤特征以及儿童PTSD和分离的自我报告存在相关性,但在得出的量表上临床组之间不存在差异,这表明这些量表测量的是一般性痛苦,而非与创伤相关的痛苦。