Child and Adolescent Mental Health Research Group, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Santa Rosa 39-57, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain.
Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Passeig Sant Joan de Déu, 2, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Aug;59(8):1449-1460. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02535-8. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
Almost 20% of children and adolescents who attend in mental health centres are witnesses of domestic violence (WDVs). It would therefore be clinically useful to have an appropriate screening instrument for this population, such as the PTSD-CBCL. Our aim here was thus to assess the psychometric properties of relevant tools by determining their internal consistency, sensitivity/specificity, and positive/negative predictive values in our centre's population.
We recruited 194 parents of children aged 4-16 at the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service of the Hospital Sant Joan de Déu and Els Pins primary school. This sample was divided into: (1) a WDV group (n = 104); (2) an ADHD diagnosis group (n = 28); and (3) a general population (GP) primary school group (n = 62).
The PTSD-CBCL total reliability score was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.87). We found significant mean difference for WDV vs. GP (MD = 8.57; p < 0.001) with significantly higher mean scores in WDV than in GP. We also found significant differences for ADHD vs. GP (MD = 6.91; p < 0.001) with higher mean scores in ADHD than in GP. We observed good discriminatory power indices in the following group comparisons: WDV vs. GP, ADHD vs. GP, WDV vs. ADHD + GP, and GP vs. WDV + ADHD. Nevertheless, the PTSD-CBCL did not discriminate WDV vs. ADHD.
Thus, we conclude that the PTSD-CBCL instrument has good discriminatory power in general and clinical populations, and could be implemented in the context of prevention and early intervention after trauma.
在精神卫生中心就诊的儿童和青少年中,近 20%是目睹家庭暴力(WDV)的儿童。因此,对于这一人群,有一个合适的筛查工具将具有重要的临床意义,例如 PTSD-CBCL。我们的目的是通过确定 PTSD-CBCL 在我们中心人群中的内部一致性、敏感性/特异性、阳性/阴性预测值,来评估相关工具的心理测量学特性。
我们招募了圣若翰保禄儿童和青少年心理健康服务中心和埃尔斯品小学的 194 名 4-16 岁儿童的家长。该样本分为三组:(1)WDV 组(n=104);(2)ADHD 诊断组(n=28);(3)普通人群(GP)小学组(n=62)。
PTSD-CBCL 的总信度得分较高(克朗巴赫的 alpha=0.87)。我们发现 WDV 与 GP 之间存在显著的均值差异(MD=8.57;p<0.001),WDV 的平均得分明显高于 GP。我们还发现 ADHD 与 GP 之间存在显著差异(MD=6.91;p<0.001),ADHD 的平均得分高于 GP。在以下组间比较中,我们观察到了良好的判别能力指数:WDV 与 GP、ADHD 与 GP、WDV 与 ADHD+GP、GP 与 WDV+ADHD。然而,PTSD-CBCL 并不能区分 WDV 与 ADHD。
因此,我们得出结论,PTSD-CBCL 工具在一般人群和临床人群中具有良好的判别能力,可在创伤后预防和早期干预的背景下实施。