Shafi Shahid, Elliott Alan C, Gentilello Larry
Department of Surgery, Division of Burn, Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas 75390-9158, USA.
J Trauma. 2005 Nov;59(5):1081-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000188647.03665.fd.
Successful application of induced hypothermia (HT) after stroke and cardiac arrest has led to a resurgence of interest in its potential protective effects in trauma patients. Although clinical studies demonstrate an adverse effect, they consist of small studies from single institutions. We tested the hypothesis that HT is associated with improved survival in trauma patients by analyzing a large, national trauma database.
The study included all patients in the National Trauma Data Bank (1994-2002) aged 18 to 55 years old with temperature at presentation to the emergency department and base deficit (BD) recorded. Hypothermic (temperature, <35 degrees C; n = 3267) patients and patients with normothermia (temperature, > or =35 degrees C; n = 35,283) patients were compared. Two analyses were conducted to control for the association between HT and injury severity. First, hypothermic and normothermic (NT) patients were stratified by injury severity score (ISS) and shock (blood pressure < or = 90 mm Hg). Next, logistic regression was used to control for effects of age, sex, mechanism, ISS, head, chest, and abdominal injuries, BP, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and BD, with survival as the dependent and HT as the predictor variable.
Although HT was more common in more seriously injured patients, stratified analysis revealed that hypothermic patients have significantly higher mortality than patients with the same severity of injury who remain NT. Even after controlling for injury severity and the other potential confounders listed above, HT remained a strong, independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.35).
There is no apparent protective effect of HT in trauma patients. HT itself, not just its association with shock, injury severity, and other cofactors lead to a significant increase in mortality in injured patients. Continued, aggressive efforts to prevent and treat HT are warranted.
中风和心脏骤停后成功应用诱导性低温(HT)引发了人们对其在创伤患者中潜在保护作用的兴趣再度兴起。尽管临床研究显示出不良影响,但这些研究均来自单一机构的小型研究。我们通过分析一个大型的全国性创伤数据库,检验了HT与创伤患者生存率提高相关的假设。
该研究纳入了国家创伤数据库(1994 - 2002年)中所有年龄在18至55岁、在急诊科就诊时记录了体温和碱缺失(BD)的患者。对低温(体温<35摄氏度;n = 3267)患者和体温正常(体温≥35摄氏度;n = 35283)患者进行了比较。进行了两项分析以控制HT与损伤严重程度之间的关联。首先,将低温和体温正常(NT)患者按损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和休克(血压≤90 mmHg)进行分层。其次,使用逻辑回归来控制年龄、性别、受伤机制、ISS、头部、胸部和腹部损伤、血压、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分和BD的影响,以生存作为因变量,HT作为预测变量。
尽管HT在伤势更严重的患者中更常见,但分层分析显示,低温患者的死亡率显著高于伤势相同但体温正常的患者。即使在控制了损伤严重程度和上述其他潜在混杂因素后,HT仍然是死亡率的一个强有力的独立预测因素(优势比,1.19;95%置信区间,1.05 - 1.35)。
HT对创伤患者没有明显的保护作用。HT本身,而不仅仅是其与休克、损伤严重程度和其他辅助因素的关联,会导致受伤患者的死亡率显著增加。因此,有必要持续积极地努力预防和治疗HT。