Foster-Fishman Pennie, Nowell Branda, Deacon Zermarie, Nievar M Angela, McCann Peggy
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Dec;36(3-4):275-91. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-8626-y.
In recent years, the field of community psychology has given considerable attention to how research and evaluation methods should be designed to support our goals of empowerment and social justice. Yet, as a field, we have given much less attention to whether the use of our methods actually achieves or supports our empowerment agenda. With the primary purpose of beginning to establish the norm of reporting on the impacts of our methods, this paper reports on the findings from interviews of 16 youth and adults who had participated in one participatory evaluation method (Photovoice). Two specific questions were examined: (1) What is the impact of participating in a Photovoice effort; and (2) How does the method of Photovoice foster these impacts? Overall, participants noted that they were significantly affected by their experiences as photographers and through their dialogue with neighbors during Photovoice group sessions. Impacts ranged from an increased sense of control over their own lives to the emergence of the kinds of awareness, relationships, and efficacy supportive of participants becoming community change agents. According to participants, Photovoice fostered these changes by (a) empowering them as experts on their lives and community, (b) fostering deep reflection, and (c) creating a context safe for exploring diverse perspectives. The implications of these findings for the science and practice of community psychology are discussed.
近年来,社区心理学领域相当关注应如何设计研究与评估方法,以支持我们的赋权及社会正义目标。然而,作为一个领域,我们对自身方法的使用是否真的实现或支持了我们的赋权议程却关注甚少。本文主要目的是开始确立报告我们方法影响的规范,报告了对16名参与过一种参与式评估方法(摄影之声)的青年和成年人的访谈结果。研究了两个具体问题:(1)参与摄影之声活动有什么影响;(2)摄影之声方法如何促成这些影响?总体而言,参与者指出,他们作为摄影师的经历以及在摄影之声小组活动期间与邻居的对话对他们产生了重大影响。影响范围从对自己生活的掌控感增强,到出现有助于参与者成为社区变革推动者的意识、人际关系和效能感。参与者认为,摄影之声通过以下方式促成了这些变化:(a)赋予他们作为自己生活和社区专家的权力;(b)促进深入反思;(c)营造一个安全的环境以探索不同观点。本文讨论了这些发现对社区心理学科学与实践的启示。