• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性领导力项目的定性评估:一项全球多部门系统综述

Qualitative evaluations of women's leadership programs: a global, multi-sector systematic review.

作者信息

Gardiner Anna, Chur-Hansen Anna, Turnbull Deborah, Semmler Carolyn

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Psychol. 2023 May 24;75(1):2213781. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2023.2213781. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1080/00049530.2023.2213781
PMID:40665996
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12175695/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The contribution of women's leadership programs to gender change in organisations is controversial, and evidence of programs' effectiveness is siloed across countries, sectors and industries. This systematic review aimed to provide a summary of current global efforts to evaluate women's leadership programs.

METHOD

A systematic review protocol was registered with Open Science Framework prior to data extraction. Eight databases from multidisciplinary fields including (but not limited to) behavioural, social, physical, health and life sciences, management and business, and gender and women's studies were searched for academic papers examining the outcomes of women's leadership programs. Twenty-four studies were appraised for methodological quality using Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and 16 studies (11 peer reviewed articles and five theses) were included in the review.

RESULTS

Data were synthesized using an updated Kirkpatrick typology with seven categories used to classify evaluation outcomes. Subjective outcome levels were addressed more frequently than objective levels. Promotion to a leadership position was the sole objective outcome addressed, but methodological limitations of the included studies mitigate a link between programs and women's career advancement.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the global evidence of women's leadership programs' impact on individuals and organisations is inconclusive. This systematic review emphasises the need for enhanced methodological and theoretical rigour to guide the development of future women's leadership programs and their evaluation.

摘要

目的

女性领导力项目对组织中性别变革的贡献存在争议,且项目有效性的证据在不同国家、部门和行业中相互孤立。本系统综述旨在总结当前全球评估女性领导力项目的努力。

方法

在数据提取之前,在开放科学框架上注册了系统综述方案。在包括(但不限于)行为科学、社会科学、自然科学、健康与生命科学、管理与商业以及性别与妇女研究等多学科领域的八个数据库中搜索了研究女性领导力项目成果的学术论文。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南对24项研究的方法质量进行了评估,16项研究(11篇同行评审文章和5篇论文)被纳入综述。

结果

使用更新后的柯克帕特里克分类法对数据进行综合,该分类法有七个类别用于对评估结果进行分类。主观结果层面比客观结果层面得到了更频繁的探讨。晋升到领导职位是唯一涉及的客观结果,但纳入研究的方法局限性削弱了项目与女性职业发展之间的联系。

结论

目前,全球范围内关于女性领导力项目对个人和组织影响的证据尚无定论。本系统综述强调需要加强方法和理论的严谨性,以指导未来女性领导力项目的开发及其评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48ac/12175695/c56db9c06f1b/RAUP_A_2213781_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48ac/12175695/c56db9c06f1b/RAUP_A_2213781_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48ac/12175695/c56db9c06f1b/RAUP_A_2213781_F0001_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Qualitative evaluations of women's leadership programs: a global, multi-sector systematic review.女性领导力项目的定性评估:一项全球多部门系统综述
Aust J Psychol. 2023 May 24;75(1):2213781. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2023.2213781. eCollection 2023.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Women's experience of menopause: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.女性更年期经历:定性证据的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep 16;13(8):250-337. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1948.
5
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
6
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.注册护士在养老院的管理和领导经验:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.
7
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
8
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.

本文引用的文献

1
Breaking Through Barriers: Factors That Influence Behavior Change Toward Leadership for Women in Academic Medicine.突破障碍:影响学术医学领域女性领导力行为改变的因素
Front Psychol. 2022 May 13;13:854488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854488. eCollection 2022.
2
The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review.工业与组织心理学中系统评价和元分析的报告质量:一项系统评价
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 22;8:1395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01395. eCollection 2017.
3
Perspectives of female medical faculty in Ethiopia on a leadership fellowship program.
埃塞俄比亚女性医学教员对领导力奖学金项目的看法。
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Sep 1;8:314-323. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5985.f644.
4
Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation.定性研究综合:利用元聚合的系统评价者的方法学指南。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.
5
The impact of gendered organizational systems on women's career advancement.性别化组织系统对女性职业发展的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 30;6:905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00905. eCollection 2015.
6
Leadership development programs for physicians: a systematic review.针对医生的领导力发展项目:一项系统综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):656-74. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3141-1. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
7
Application of qualitative methods in program planning for health promotion interventions.定性方法在健康促进干预项目规划中的应用。
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Apr;7(2):234-42. doi: 10.1177/1524839905278915.
8
Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research.为定性健康研究制定并实施一种三角测量方案。
Qual Health Res. 2006 Mar;16(3):377-94. doi: 10.1177/1049732305285708.
9
Using methods that matter: the impact of reflection, dialogue, and voice.运用重要的方法:反思、对话与表达的影响。
Am J Community Psychol. 2005 Dec;36(3-4):275-91. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-8626-y.
10
Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.不熟练却不自知:无法认识自身能力不足如何导致自我评价过高。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1121-34. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121.